Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:35:27.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phase Separated Microstructure and its Stability in InGaAs Epitaxial Layers Grown by LPE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

K. Lee
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
S. Mahajan
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
W.C. Johnson
Affiliation:
At Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903
Get access

Abstract

In0.53Ga0.47As layers were grown by LPE on (001) InP substrates in the temperature range of 480~780°C. The fine speckle contrast, which is attributed to two-dimensional phase separation, was observed in layers grown at temperatures as high as 780°C. Since the critical temperature for bulk miscibility gap is predicted to be around 450°C, this suggests that in the presence of the surface the critical temperature for the two-dimensional surface decomposition is higher than that for the bulk. The wavelength of the fine modulations does not change with the growth temperature. This could be due to the fast diffusion kinetics in the solid-liquid interface and the balance between the driving force and the gradient energy.

To examine the stability of the above microstructures, zinc diffusion experiments were carried out in the temperature range of 390 to 540°C using the ampoule technique. The diffused layers exhibit homogenous microstructures. This demonstrates that critical temperature for phase separation in bulk is below 390°C and is comparable to that predicted by theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chu, S.N.G., Nakahara, S., Strege, K.E., and Johnston, W.D., J. Appl. Phys. 57(10), 4610(1985)Google Scholar
2 Henoc, P., Izrael, A., Quillec, M., and Launois, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 40(11), 963(1982)Google Scholar
3 Mahajan, S., Dutt, B.V., H.Temkin, , R.Cava, and W.A.Bonner, , Crystal, J. growth 68(2), 589(1984)Google Scholar
4 Norman, A.G., and Booker, G.R., J. Appl. Phys. 57(10), 4715(1985)Google Scholar
5 O.Ueda, , Takechi, M., and Komeno, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54(23), 2312(1989)Google Scholar
6 McDevitt, T.L., Mahajan, S., D.E.Laughlin, , Bonner, W.A. and Kerramidas, V.G., Phys.Rev.B 45(12), 6614(1992)Google Scholar
7 Mahajan, S., Shahid, M.A., and Laughlin, D.E., in Microscopy of Semiconducting Materials, Proceeding of the Institute of Physics Conference, edited by A.G.Gullis, and J.L.Hutchison, , IPO Conf. NO. 100, ( Institute of Physics and Physical Society, London, (1989), p. 143 Google Scholar
8 Stringfellow, G.B., J. Electronic Mat. 11(5), 903(1982)Google Scholar
9 Onabe, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 21(5), 797(1982)Google Scholar
10 Kuphal, E., J. Crystal Growth 67,441(1984)Google Scholar
11 U.Gösele, and Morehead, F., J. Appl. Phys. 52,4617(1981)Google Scholar
12 F.P.Dabkowski, , P.Gavrilovic, , K.Meehan, , W.Stutius, , J.E.Williams, , M.A.Shahid, and S.Mahajan, ., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52(25), 2142(1988)Google Scholar