Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:37:42.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perovskite Ceramics from Mechanically Activated Batches for Immobilization of Rare Earth– Actinide Fraction of HLW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

S.V. Chizhevskaya ,
N.E. Cherniavskaya ,
A.V. Ochkin ,
A.M. Chekmarev  and
S.V. Stefanovsky
S.V. Chizhevskaya
Affiliation:
D.Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Miusskaya 9, Moscow, Russia
N.E. Cherniavskaya
Affiliation:
SIA Radon, 7th Rostovskii per., 2/14, Moscow 119121, Russia,Email: [email protected]
A.V. Ochkin
Affiliation:
D.Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Miusskaya 9, Moscow, Russia
A.M. Chekmarev
Affiliation:
D.Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Miusskaya 9, Moscow, Russia
S.V. Stefanovsky
Affiliation:
D.Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology, Miusskaya 9, Moscow, Russia
Get access

Abstract

The effects of different methods of grinding or mechanical milling of precursor mixtures were determined for the structure and properties of perovskite ceramics with the formulation Ca1-xGdxTi1-xAlxO3 (0 ≤x ≤ 1). The ceramics were prepared by coldpressing finely ground precursor mixtures at 100-300 MPa to form pellets that were then sintered at 1300-1500oC. Ceramic samples prepared from precursor material batches treated in a ball or planetary mill or ground in a mortar contained unreacted oxides and had low mechanical integrity and chemical durability. The ceramics produced from precursor material treated by high performance mechanical milling using a high speed rotating vortex layer of ferromagnetic bodies were composed of a major perovskite-structured phase (90-95%) with a Ca-Ti-Gd-Al-O composition and a minor pyrochlore-structured phase with a composition close to that of gadolinium titanate; these ceramics had the highest bending strength (200-340 MPa) and density (~90% of theoretical) and the lowest leach rates for uranium, plutonium, and americium among all the samples studied.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 663: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste management XXIV , 2000 , 367
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ringwood, A.E., Kesson, S.E., Reeve, K.D., Levins, D.M., Ramm, E.J., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, 1988, pp. 233-334.Google Scholar
2. Stefanovsky, S.V., Chizhevskaya, S.V., Phys. Chem. Mater. Treat. (Russ.) [6] (1999) 81.Google Scholar
3. Chizhevskaya, S.V., Stefanovsky, S.V., Chekmarev, A.M., Medvedev, D.G., Klimenko, O.M., Chem. Technol. (Russ.) [3] (2000) 8.Google Scholar
4. Stefanovsky, S.V., Chizhevskaya, S.V., in Waste Management ‘2K. Proceedings. Tucson, AZ, February 27 – March 2, 2000. CD Rom. Rep. 55-4.Google Scholar
5.Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook, US Report No. DOE/TIC-11440, Hanford: Materials Characterization Center, 1983.Google Scholar
6. Vance, E.R., Day, R.A., Zhang, Z., Begg, B.D., Ball, C.J., Blackford, M.G., J. Sol. State Chem. 124 (1996) 77.Google Scholar