Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:55:25.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Permeability Changes in Crystalline Rocks Due to Temperature: Effects of Mineral Assemblage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

C. A. Morrow ,
D. E. Moore  and
J. D. Byerlee
C. A. Morrow
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS/977, Menlo Park, CA 94025
D. E. Moore
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS/977, Menlo Park, CA 94025
J. D. Byerlee
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS/977, Menlo Park, CA 94025
Get access

Abstract

The change in permeability with time of granite, quartzite, anorthosite and gabbro was measured while these rocks were subjected to a temperature gradient. The highest temperature (at the heat source) was fixed at 250°C, while low temperatures ranged from 60 to 111°C, depending on rock type. Permeability reductions of up to two orders of magnitude were observed, with the greatest reactions occurring in the quartzite. These changes are thought to be caused by dissolution of minerals at high temperatures, and redeposition of the dissolved material at lower temperatures. Quartz appears to be an important mineral in this self-sealing process. If very low permeability is desired around a nuclear waste repository in crystalline rocks, then a quartz-rich rock may be the most appropriate host.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 44: Symposium N – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII , 1984 , 467
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Morrow, C., Lockner, D., Moore, D., and Byerlee, J., Permeability of granite in a temperature gradient, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 3002, 1981.Google Scholar
[2] Moore, D., Morrow, C., and Byerlee, J., Chemical reactions accompanying fluid flow through granite held in a temperature gradient, Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 47, 445, 1983.Google Scholar
[3] Lichtner, P., Helgeson, H., and Pruess, K., Numerical modeling of fluid flow with simultaneous chemical reaction in hydrothermal systems, GSA Abstracts with programs, 15, 627, 1983.Google Scholar
[4] Kranz, R., and Blacic, J., Permeability changes during timedependent deformation of silicate rock, Geophy. Res. Let., 11, 975, 1984.Google Scholar
[5] Moore, D.E., Morrow, C., and Byerlee, J.D., SiO2 precipitation accompanying fluid flow through granite held in a temperature gradient, Proc. Seventh Ann. Workshop Geoth. Res. Eng., Stanford Univ., 1981.Google Scholar
[6] Kharaka, Y.K., and Barnes, I., SOLMNEQ: Solution-mineral equilibrium computations. NTIS, U.S. Depart. Commerce, PB-215, 899, 81 pp., 1973.Google Scholar
[7] Charles, R.W., and Bayhurst, G.K., Rock-fluid interactions in a temperature gradient: Biotite granodiorite +H2O, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 15, 137, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Morrow, C., Moore, D., and Byerlee, J., Permeability and pore-fluid chemistry of the Topopah Member of the Paintbrush Tuff, Nevada Test Site, in a temperature gradient–Application to nuclear waste storage, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 26, 883, 1984.Google Scholar
[9] Grout, F.F., and Schwartz, G.M., The geology of the anorthosites of the Minnesota coast of Lake Superior, Minnesota Geol. Surv. Bull. 28, 119 pp., 1939.Google Scholar
[10] Taylor, R.B., Geology of the Duluth Gabbro Complex near Duluth, Minnesota, Minnesota Geol. Surv. Bull. 44, 63 pp., 1964.Google Scholar