Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:05:09.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance Assessment of Low-Level Waste Disposal Facilities Using Coupled Unsaturated Flow and Reactive Transport Simulators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Diana H. Bacon ,
B. Peter McGrail ,
Vicky L. Freedman ,
Giancarlo Ventura ,
Piero Risoluti  and
Kenneth M. Krupk
Diana H. Bacon
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, U.S.A.
B. Peter McGrail
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, U.S.A.
Vicky L. Freedman
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, U.S.A.
Giancarlo Ventura
Affiliation:
Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy, and the Environment (ENEA), C.R. Casaccia, Via Anguillarese, 301, 00060 Rome, Italy
Piero Risoluti
Affiliation:
Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy, and the Environment (ENEA), C.R. Casaccia, Via Anguillarese, 301, 00060 Rome, Italy
Kenneth M. Krupk
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Recent advances in the development of reactive chemical transport simulators have made it possible to use these tools in performance assessments (PAs) for nuclear waste disposal. Reactive transport codes were used to evaluate the impacts of design modifications on the performance of two shallow subsurface disposal systems for low-level radioactive waste. The first disposal system, located at the Hanford site in Richland, Washington, is for disposal of lowlevel waste glass. Glass waste blocks will be disposed in subsurface trenches, surrounded by backfill material. Using different waste package sizes and layering had a small impact on technetium release rates to the vadose zone. The second disposal system involves a hypothetical repository for low-level waste in Italy. A model of uranium release from a grout waste form was developed using the STORM reactive transport code. Uranium is predicted to be relatively insoluble for several hundred years under the high-pH environment of the cement pore water. The effect of using different filler materials between the waste packages on uranium flux to the vadose zone proved to have a negligible impact on release rates.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 713: Symposium JJ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV , 2002 , JJ11.42
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mann, F. M., Burgard, K. C., Root, W. R., II, R. J. P., Finfrock, S. H., Khaleel, R., Bacon, D. H., Freeman, E. J., McGrail, B. P., Wurstner, S. K., and Lamont, P. E., Report No. DOE/ORP-2000-24 Rev. 0, 2001.Google Scholar
2. Wootan, D. W., Report No. HNF-4921, Rev. 0, 1999.Google Scholar
3. Risoluti, P., presented at the ICEM'99; 7th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation, Nagoya, Japan, 1999 (unpublished).Google Scholar
4. McGrail, B. P. and Bacon, D. H., Report No. PNNL-10830 Rev. 1, 1998.Google Scholar
5. Bacon, D. H., White, M. D., and McGrail, B. P., Report No. PNNL-13108, 2000.Google Scholar
6. Burbank, D. A., Report No. RPP-7908, Revision 0, 2001.Google Scholar
7. McGrail, B. P., Bacon, D. H., Icenhower, J. P., Ebert, W. L., Martin, P. F., Schaef, H. T., and Rodriguez, E. A., Report No. PNNL-13043, Rev. 2, 2001.Google Scholar
8. Bacon, D. H. and McGrail, B. P., Report No. PNNL-13369, 2001.Google Scholar
9. Kaplan, D. I. and Serne, R. J., Report No. PNNL-13037, 1999.Google Scholar
10. Meyer, P. D. and Serne, R. J., Report No. PNNL-13035, 1999.Google Scholar
11. Khaleel, R., Report No. HNF-4769, Rev. 1, 1999.Google Scholar
12. Steefel, C. I. and Yabusaki, S. B., Report No. PNL-11166, 1996.Google Scholar
13. Rockhold, M. L., Fayer, M. J., and Heller, P. R., UC-510 Report No. PNL-8813, 1993; C. T. Kincaid, J. A. Voogd, J. W. Shade, J. H. Westsik, Jr., G. A. Whyatt, M. D. Freshley, M. G. Piepho, K. A. Blanchard, K. Rhoads, and B. G. Lauzon, Report No. WHC-SD-WM-EE-004, 1995.Google Scholar
14. Krupka, K. M. and Serne, R. J., Report No. PNNL-11408, NUREG/CR-6377, 1998; L. J. Criscenti, R. J. Serne, K. M. Krupka, and M. I. Wood, Report No. PNNL-11182, 1996.Google Scholar