Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:27:13.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance Assessment of Geological Disposal of High-level Radioactive Waste in a Plastic Clay formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Jan Marivoet ,
Xavier Sillen ,
Dirk Mallants  and
Peter De Preter
Jan Marivoet
Affiliation:
Waste & Disposal Dept., SCK•CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Xavier Sillen
Affiliation:
Waste & Disposal Dept., SCK•CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Dirk Mallants
Affiliation:
Waste & Disposal Dept., SCK•CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Peter De Preter
Affiliation:
NIRAS/ONDRAF, Kunstlaan 12, 1210 Brussels, Belgium Waste & Disposal Dept., SCK•CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

In Belgium the possibilities to dispose of high-level waste in the plastic Boom Clay formation has been studied since 1975. Consequently many results of the site characterisation programme are already available. Various performance assessments have been carried out dealing with the disposal of high-level waste arising from reprocessing and with direct disposal of spent fuel. The performance assessment consists of two main steps: scenario development and consequence analyses. The scenario analysis is based on a catalogue of features, events and processes (FEPs) having the potential to influence the behaviour of the repository system. Two main groups of scenarios are distinguished. The normal evolution scenario, including a number of variants, treats the FEPs that are fairly sure to take place. Altered evolution scenarios focus on FEPs having a probability of occurrence lower than one but that might influence the performance of the repository system. For the impact analyses, a robust concept approach was introduced, which focused the analyses on a limited number of well-characterised barriers and processes. The impact analyses are complemented with sensitivity and uncertainty analyses based on deterministic and probabilistic approaches.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 713: Symposium JJ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV , 2002 , JJ4.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Second safety assessment and feasibility interim report (SAFIR 2) (NIRAS/ONDRAF, Brussels, report in preparation).Google Scholar
2. Marivoet, J. and Bonne, A., PAGIS: Performance Assessment of Geological Isolation Systems, Clay Option (European Commission, Luxembourg, report EUR 11776 EN, 1989).Google Scholar
3. Gomit, J.M., Marivoet, J., Raimbault, P. and Recreo, F., EVEREST, Vol. 1: Common aspects of the study (European Commission, Luxembourg, report EUR 17449/1 EN, 1997).Google Scholar
4. Marivoet, J. and Preter, P. De, in Proc. of NEA Workshop on Scenario Development (NEA/OECD, Paris, 2001) pp. 71–75.Google Scholar
5. NEA, Systematic approaches to scenario development (OECD - NEA, Paris, 1992).Google Scholar
6. Loutre, M.F. and Berger, A., Climatic Change 46, 61 (2000).Google Scholar
7. National Research Council, Technical Basis for Yucca Mountain Standards (Nat. Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1995).Google Scholar
8. Sumerling, T.J., Zuidema, P., Grogan, H.A. and Dorp, F. Van, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. High-Level Radioactive Waste Management, Los Angeles, April 1993, Vol. 2, pp. 1085–1097 (1993)Google Scholar
9. Lemmens, K., J. of Nucl. Mater. 298 (1/2), 11 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Mallants, D., Marivoet, J. and Sillen, X., J. of Nucl. Mater. 298 (1/2), 125 (2001).Google Scholar
11. Baudoin, P., Gay, D., Certes, C., Serres, C., Alonso, J., Nosek, U., Martens, K.H., Dodd, D., Marivoet, J. and Vieno, T., 2000, Spent fuel disposal Performance Assessment (SPA project) (European Commission, Luxembourg, report EUR 19132 EN, 1997).Google Scholar
12. Sillen, X. and Marivoet, J., Spent fuel performance assessment for a hypothetical repository in the Boom Clay at the Mol site (Belgium) (SCK•CEN, Mol, report BLG-877, 2001).Google Scholar
13. Wang, L., Marivoet, J., Canniére, P. De, Sillen, X., Moors, H., Aertsens, M. and Put, M., Proc. NEA Workshop The use of thermodynamic databases in performance assessment (NEA/OECD, Paris, in press).Google Scholar
14. Maes, N., Moors, H., Dierckx, A., Canniére, P. De and Put, M., J. of Contaminant Hydrology 36, 231 (1999).Google Scholar
15. Dierckx, A., Put, M., Canniére, P. De, Wang, L., Maes, N., Aertsens, M., Maes, A., Vancluysen, J., Verdickt, W., Gielen, R., Christiaens, M., Warwick, P., Hall, A. and Lee, J. van der, Transport of radionuclides due to complexation with organic matter in clay formations (Trancom-Clay) (European Commission, Luxembourg, report EUR 19135 EN, 2000).Google Scholar
16. Meyus, Y., Wemaere, I., and Marivoet, J., Proc. MODFLOW '98 Conference (Colorado School of Mines, Golden, 1998) pp. 841–847.Google Scholar
17. Marivoet, J., Keer, I. Van, Wemaere, I., Hardy, L., Pitsch, H., Beaucaire, C., Michelot, J.L., Marlin, C., Phillipot, A.C., Hassanizadeh, M. and Weert, F. van, A Palaeohydrogeological study of the Mol site (PHYMOL Project) (EC, Luxembourg, report EUR 19146 EN, 2000).Google Scholar
18. Hardy, L., Wemaere, I., Marivoet, J. and Sillen, X., in Tracers and Modelling in Hydrogeology, edited by Dassargues, A. (IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK, Publ. No. 262, 2000) pp. 263–268.Google Scholar
19. Marivoet, J., Preter, P. De and Sillen, X., ICEM'01 Conference (ASME, CD-ROM, 2001).Google Scholar
20. Craen, M. De, Delleuze, D., Volckaert, G., Sneyers, A. and Put, M., Proc. ENS Topseal '99 Conf. (European Nuclear Society, 1999), Vol. 2, pp. 214–218.Google Scholar
21. Smailos, E., Azkarate, I., Sebastan, S., Gago, J.A., Iseghem, P. Van, Kursten, B. and McMenamin, T., in Proc. IVth European Conf. on Management and Disposal of Radioactive Waste, edited by McMenamin, T. (European Commission, Luxembourg, 1997) pp. 209–223.Google Scholar