Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:26:15.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Performance Assessment of Engineered Barriers Using the Vault Model.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

L.H. Johnson
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, R0E 1L0
D.M. Leneveu
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada, R0E 1L0
Get access

Abstract

The Vault Model for assessing engineered barrier performance has been developed as part of the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement to be presented to a Federal Environmental Assessment Review Panel reviewing the Canadian nuclear fuel waste disposal concept. The model describes the behaviour of titanium containers, radionuclide release from used fuel, and migration of radionuclides through buffer and backfill materials and into the surrounding geosphere. Vault Model simulations have shown that the release of radionuclides from the engineered barrier system is dominated by the release from the fuel-sheath gap and grain boundaries in used fuel. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses have illustrated how releases from the vault are affected by both the uncertainty in model parameters and the assumptions made in the development of the models. It is likely that the combined effects of a number of conservatisms in the model result in the releases from the engineered barrier system being overpredicted by several orders of magnitude.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Allan, C.J. and Stephens, M.E., presented at 8th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, Lung-Tan, Taiwan, April 1216, 1992 (to be published in proceedings).Google Scholar
2. Dormuth, K.W. and Sherman, G.R., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-6814 (1981).Google Scholar
3. Dormuth, K.W., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV, edited by Abrajano, T. and Johnson, L.H., (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1991) pp. 779786.Google Scholar
4. Davison, C.C., Chan, T., Brown, A., Gascoyne, M., Kamineni, D.C., Lodha, G.S., Melnyk, T.W., Scheier, N.V., Soonawala, N.M., Stanchell, F.W., Stevenson, D.R., Thorne, G.A., Whitaker, S.H., Vandergraaf, T.T. and Vilks, P., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10719, COG-93-9 (in preparation).Google Scholar
5. Garisto, N.C. and LeNeveu, D.M., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10277, (1991).Google Scholar
6. Johnson, L.H., Shoesmith, D.W., Ikeda, B.M. and King, F., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV, edited by Sombret, C.G., (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1992) pp. 439446.Google Scholar
7. Garisto, F. and Garisto, N.C., presented at Technical Workshop on Near- Field Performance Assessment for High-Level Waste, Oct. 1517, 1990, Madrid, SKB Technical Report 91–59 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Clarke, C.F., Hardie, D. and Ikeda, B.M., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10477, COG-92-162, (1992).Google Scholar
9. Garisto, N.C., Johnson, L.H. and Hocking, W.H., in Proceedings Second International Conference on CANDU Fuel, 15 Oct., 1989, Pembroke, Ontario, pp. 352368.Google Scholar
10. Shoesmith, D.W. and Sunder, S., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10488 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Sunder, S., Boyer, G.D. and Miller, N.H., J. Nucl. Mat. 175, 163 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Lemire, R.J. and Garisto, F., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10009 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Garisto, N.C. and LeNeveu, D.M., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-9578 (1989).Google Scholar
14. Johnson, L.H., Shoesmith, D.W., LeNeveu, D.M., Garisto, N.C., Oscarson, D.W., Gray, M.N. and Lemire, R.J., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10714, COG-93-4 (in preparation).Google Scholar
15. Pescatore, C. and Sastre, S., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R.E., (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1988) p. 773.Google Scholar
16. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Johnson, L.H. and Sellinger, D.M., Nucl. Tech. 77, 320 (1987).Google Scholar
17. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Tait, J.C., Garisto, N.C., Porth, R.J., Ross, J.P.M., Glowa, G.A. and Barnsdale, T.R., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV, edited by Sombret, C.G., (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1992) pp. 373380.Google Scholar
18. Stroes-Gascoyne, S., this volume.Google Scholar
19. Garisto, N.C. and LeNeveu, D.M., in High-Level Waste Management, Proceedings Third International Conference Las Vegas, NV (1992), pp. 22842289.Google Scholar