Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:18:31.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterned Deposition of Nanoparticles Using Dip Pen Nanolithography For Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2015

Kevin F. Dahlberg ,
Kelly Woods ,
Carol Jenkins ,
Christine C. Broadbridge  and
Todd C. Schwendemann
Kevin F. Dahlberg
Affiliation:
Southern Physics Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT
Kelly Woods
Affiliation:
Southern Physics Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT
Carol Jenkins
Affiliation:
Southern Physics Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT
Christine C. Broadbridge
Affiliation:
Southern Physics Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT Center for Research on Interface Structures and Phenomenon (CRISP), Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT
Todd C. Schwendemann
Affiliation:
Southern Physics Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT
Get access

Abstract

Ordered carbon nanotube (CNT) growth by deposition of nanoparticle catalysts using dip pen nanolithography (DPN) is presented. DPN is a direct write, tip based lithography technique capable of multi-component deposition of a wide range of materials with nanometer precision. A NanoInk NLP 2000 is used to pattern different catalytic nanoparticle solutions on various substrates. To generate a uniform pattern of nanoparticle clusters, various conditions need to be considered. These parameters include: the humidity in the vessel, temperature, and tip-surface dwell time. By patterning different nanoparticle solutions next to each other, identical growth conditions can be compared for different catalysts in a streamlined analysis process. Fe, Ni, and Co nanoparticle solutions patterned on silicon, mica, and graphite substrates serve as nucleation sites for CNT growth. The CNTs were synthesized by a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reaction. Each nanoparticle patterned substrate is placed in a tube furnace held at 725°C during CNT growth. The carbon source used in the growth chamber is toluene. The toluene is injected at a rate of 5 mL/hr. Growth is observed for Fe and Ni nanoparticle patterns, but is lacking for the Co patterns. The results of these reactions provide important information regarding efficient and highly reproducible mechanisms for CNT growth.

Keywords

lithography (deposition)Cchemical vapor deposition (CVD) (deposition)
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1752: Symposium MM – Carbon Nanotubes—Synthesis, Properties, Functionalization, and Applications , 2014 , pp. 65 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Piner, Richard D., Zhu, Jin, Xu, Feng, Hong, Seunghun, and Mirkin, Chad A.. “‘Dip-Pen’ Nanolithography.” Science 283, no. 5402 (January 29, 1999): 661–663. doi:10.1126/science.283.5402.661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, E. L. (2006). “Nanophysics and nanotechnology: an introduction to modern concepts in nanoscience.” (2nd updated and enl. ed.). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajayan, Pulickel M., and Zhou, Otto Z.. “Applications of Carbon Nanotubes.” In Carbon Nanotubes, edited by Dresselhaus, Mildred S., Dresselhaus, Gene, and Avouris, Phaedon, 391– 425. Topics in Applied Physics 80. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shokrieh, M. M., and Rafiee, R.. “A Review of the Mechanical Properties of Isolated Carbon Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotube Composites.” Mechanics of Composite Materials 46, no. 2 (July 1, 2010): 155–172. doi:10.1007/s11029-010-9135-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbesen, T. W., Lezec, H. J., Hiura, H., Bennett, J. W., Ghaemi, H. F., and Thio, T.. “Electrical Conductivity of Individual Carbon Nanotubes.” Nature 382, no. 6586 (July 4, 1996): 54–56. doi:10.1038/382054a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Keith A., Veenhuizen, Peter T. M., de la Torre, Beatriz G., Eritja, Ramon, and Dekker, Cees. “Nanotechnology: Carbon Nanotubes with DNA Recognition.” Nature 420, no. 6917 (December 19, 2002): 761–761. doi:10.1038/420761a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kocabas, Coskun, Shim, Moonsub, and Rogers, John A.. “Spatially Selective Guided Growth of High-Coverage Arrays and Random Networks of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Their Integration into Electronic Devices.” Journal of the American Chemical Society 128, no. 14 (April 1, 2006): 4540–4541. doi:10.1021/ja0603150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nikolaev, Pavel, Bronikowski, Michael J, Bradley, R.Kelley, Rohmund, Frank, Colbert, Daniel T, Smith, K.A, and Smalley, Richard E. “Gas-phase Catalytic Growth of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes from Carbon Monoxide.” Chemical Physics Letters 313, no. 1–2 (November 5, 1999): 91–97. doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01029-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. J., Cheol, J., Seung, C. L., Young, R. C., Jin, H. L., Kyoung, I. C. “Diametercontrolled Growth of Carbon Nanotubes Using Thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition.” Chemical Physics Letters 341, no. 3–4 (June 22, 2001): 245–249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, O., Jung, J., Doo, S., Kim, S. S., Noh, T. H., Kim, K. I. and Lim, Y. S., Met. Mater. Int., 16, 663–667 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotopoulos, N., Xanthakis, J. P., Diamond Relat. Mater. 19, 557–561 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, C., Cruz, M., Depalma, J., Conroy, M., Benardo, B., Horbachuk, M., & Schwendemann, T. C. (2014). Characterization of carbon nanotube growth via cvd synthesis from a liquid precursor. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems, 23(01n02).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. T., Park, J., Choi, Y. S., Ryu, H., & Lee, H. J. (2002). Temperature-dependent growth of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes in the range 800-1100 C. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 106(31), 7614–7618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar