Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:09:52.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partial Reduction/Re-Oxidation Processing of Y-Ba-Cu-O Sputtered Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

F.H. Garzon ,
J. G. Beery ,
D. K. Wilde  and
I. D. Raistrick
F.H. Garzon
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM 87545
J. G. Beery
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM 87545
D. K. Wilde
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM 87545
I. D. Raistrick
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM 87545
Get access

Abstract

Thin films of Y‐Ba‐Cu‐O were produced by RF sputtering of YBa2Cu3O7‐x ceramic targets, using a variety of plasma compositions, RF power levels, and substrate temperatures. Post annealing of these films in oxygen produced superconducting films with Tc values between 40‐60 K, broad transition widths and semiconductor‐like electrical behavior above Tc. Subsequent annealing at 850°C in an inert gas with a residual oxygen partial pressure of ≤10 ppm followed by an oxygen anneal produced high quality thin films: Tc> 85 K with narrow transition widths. The structure and morphology of these films during reduction‐oxidation processing were monitored using X‐ray diffraction and electron microscopy.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 169: Symposium M – High Temperature Superconductors: Fundamental Properties and Novel Materials Processing , 1989 , 651
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Enomoto, Y., Murakami, T., Suzuki, M., and Moriwari, K., J.J. of Appl. Phys. 26, 1248 (1987)Google Scholar
2 Michikami, O., Asano, H., Katoh, Y., Kubo, S. and Tanabe, K., J.J. of Appl. Phys. 26, 1199 (1987)Google Scholar
3 Sandstrom, R.L., Gallagher, W.J., Dinger, T. R., Koch, R. H., Laibowitz, R. B., Kleinsasser, A. W., Gambino, R.J., Bumble, B., and Chisholm, M.F., Appl. Phys Lett. 53,444 (1988)Google Scholar
4 Liou, S.H., Hong, M., Kwo, J., Davidson, B.A., Chen, H.S., Nakahara, S., Boone, T., and Felder, R. J., Appl. Phys Lett. 52, 1735, (1988)Google Scholar
5 Kwasnick, R.F., Luborsky, F.E., Hall, E.L., Garbauskas, M.F., Borst, K., and Curran, M.J., J.Mater. Res. 4, 257 (1989)Google Scholar
6 Tarascon, J.M., Barboux, P., Miceli, P.F., Greene, L. H., and Hull, G.W., Phys. Rev. B37,7458, (1988)Google Scholar
7 Testardi, L. et al. , Gordon Conference on Superconducting Films July 1989, poster session presentation (unpublished).Google Scholar
8 Garzon, F.H., Beery, J.G., Brown, D.R., Sherman, R.J. and Raistrick, I.D., Appl. Phy. Lett.,54 1365 (1989)Google Scholar