Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:18:07.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paint As a Corrosion Sensor; Acrylic Coating Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. Zhang  and
G. S. Frankel
J. Zhang
Affiliation:
Fontana Corrosion Center, 2041 College Rd., The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
G. S. Frankel
Affiliation:
Fontana Corrosion Center, 2041 College Rd., The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
Get access

Abstract

Paint systems containing color-change or fluorescing compounds have been found to be sensitive to underlying corrosion processes by reacting to the pH increase associated with the cathodic reaction that accompanies corrosion. The sensitivity of these coating systems for detection of cathodic reactions associated with corrosion was determined by applying constant cathodic current and measuring the charge at which color change or fluorescence is detected. Visual observation of coated samples with the unaided eye can detect changes resulting from a charge corresponding to a hemispherical pit with depth on the order of 3–15 microns. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy was also performed to test the influence of the indicating compound addition on the coating corrosion protectiveness.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 503: Symposium JJ – Nondestructive Characterization of Materials in Aging Systems , 1997 , 15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Groner, D., in 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC. Structures. Structural Dynamics. and Materials Conference and Exhibit. Apr. 7–10. Kissimmee, Fl (1997).Google Scholar
2. Pourbaix, A., AGARD Conference Proc., Paper No. 12, CP 0549–7191, p. 565 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Agarwala, V. S. and Fabiszewski, A., Corrosion 94 Paper No. 342, NACE International, Houston, TX (1994).Google Scholar
4. Podney, W., Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestructive Eval. Thompson, D.O. and Chimenti, D. E., Eds, 13, New York, Plenum Press, p1947 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Hoch, G. M., Localized Corrosion. NACE-3. Staehle, R. W., Brown, B. F., Kruger, J., Agrawal, A., Eds., NACE International, Houston (1974).Google Scholar
6. White, L., J. Electrochem. Soc.. 128, p. 953 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Cippolini, N., J.Electrochem.Soc., 129, p. 1517 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Johnson, R. E. and Agarwala, V. S., Corrosion 97, Paper No. 304, NACE International, Houston, TX (1997).Google Scholar
9. Johnson, R. E. and Agarwala, V. S., Mat.Perf., 33, pp. 25–29 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Encyclopedia of Analytical Science. A., Townshend, Ed., Academic Press, London (1995).Google Scholar
11. Carbonini, P., Monetta, T., Nicodemo, L., Mastronardi, P., Scatteia, B. and Bellucci, F., Mat. Sci. For., 192–194, p. 291 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Standish, J. V. and Leidheiser, H. Jr., Corrosion, 36, p. 390 (1980).Google Scholar
13. Kendig, M. and Scully, J., Corrosion. 46, p. 22 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Frankel, G. S., in “Corrosion Mechanisms in Theory and Practice,” P., Marcus and J., Oudar, eds, Marcel Dekkar Inc., NY (1995).Google Scholar
15. Frankel, G. S., Cor c. 30, p. 1203 (1990)Google Scholar