Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:59:49.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxygen Stabilization of Damage Induced by Mev Ion Implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Amitabh Jain
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Process and Device Center, Texas Instruments Inc., 13536 North Central Expressway, MS 944, Dallas, Texas 75243.
Doug Mercer
Affiliation:
Semiconductor Process and Device Center, Texas Instruments Inc., 13536 North Central Expressway, MS 944, Dallas, Texas 75243.
Get access

Abstract

As devices are scaled down and their performance is enhanced, the role of oxygen in silicon remains critical. The precipitation of oxygen away from the device region leads to desirable gettering of deleterious impurities and is a useful technique. In the device region, however, oxygen has recently been shown to take part in the annealing of dopant implants and segregate to damaged regions. This may result in the stabilization of damage structures and the attraction of unwanted impurities to sensitive regions of the device. In this work we examine these phenomena and their potential impact on device performance. For example, oxygen has been observed to segregate at two positions following a 1000°C, one hour anneal of a 2 MeV, 3.5×1015/cm2 phosphorus implant into CZ p-Si. The oxygen concentration is greatly enhanced above its initial level of 1018 O/cm3, both in the end-of-range region and at approximately half that depth, near the peak of the predicted damage profile. Iron deliberately introduced at the surface prior to annealing, getters out strongly at these locations No significant redistribution of carbon can be detected. The results assume significance in view of the increasing use of high energy implantation for both epi-layer replacement and retrograde well formation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Borland, J.O., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 354, 123 (1995)Google Scholar
2 Borland, J.O., Koelsch, R., Solid State Tech., p. 28 (Dec. 1993).Google Scholar
3 Tamura, M., in Defect Control in Semiconductors, Sumino, K. (ed.), pp. 453464, Elsevier, North Holland (1990).Google Scholar
4 Uedono, A., Wei, L., Dosho, C., Kondo, H., Tanigawa, S., Tamura, M., JJAP 30, 1597 (1991).Google Scholar
5 Sayama, H., Kinomura, A., Yuba, Y., Takai, M., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B80, 587 (1993).Google Scholar
6 Lowell, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B14, 248 (1996).Google Scholar
7 Jones, K.S., Prussin, S., Weber, E.R., Appl. Phys. A45, 1 (1988).Google Scholar
8 Krimmel, E.F., Oppolzer, H., Runge, H., Wondrak, W., Phys. Stat. Sol. A66, 565 (1981).Google Scholar
9 Ziegler, J.F, Biersack, J.P. and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, Pergamon Press, New York, 1985.Google Scholar