Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:39:51.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxidation Behaviour of Zirconia-Sialon Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Yibing Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia
Derek P. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Materials & Manufacturing Engineering, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NEI 7RU, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

In yttria densified ZrO2-sialon composites, an increase in β′:O′-sialon ratio results in a structural change in the zirconia phase because an increasing amount of nitrogen dissolves in the zirconia structure as the overall composition becomes increasingly nitrogen rich. Both ZrN and nitrogen-containing zirconia (N-ZrO2) are observed in the β′-ZrO2 composite and these phases show a poor oxidation performance above 600°C. However, the introduction of small amounts of O′ phase into the β′-ZrO2 composite has provided an effective oxygen-rich barrier to reduce the diffusion rate of nitrogen in zirconia and therefore O′-β′-ZrO2 composites showed superior oxidation resistance compared with β′-ZrO2 materials at temperatures between 600 and 1200°C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Claussen, N. and Jahn, J., J.Am.Ceram.Soc. 61(1-2), 94–5 (1978).Google Scholar
2. Lange, F.F., Falk, L.K.L. and Davis, B.I., J.Mater.Res. 2(1), 6676 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Pompe, R., in Structural Ceramics-Processing. Microstructure and Properties. ed. Bentzen, J.J. et al. , (Riso National Laboratory, Denmark, 1990), p.97.Google Scholar
4. Hoggard, D.B., Park, H.K., Morrison, R. and Slasor, S., Am. Ceram. Bull. 69(7), 1163–6 (1990)Google Scholar
5. Sanders, W.A. and Mieskowski, D.M., Adv. Ceram. Mater. 1(2), 166–73 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Weiss, J., Gauckler, L.J., Lukas, H.L., Petzow, G. and Tien, T.Y., J.Mater.Sci. 16, 29973005 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Babini, G.N., Bellosi, A., Vincenzini, P., Dalle Fabbriche, D. and Visani, R., in Science of Ceramics 12. ed by Vincenzini, P. (Ceramurgica S.R. I., Faenza, 1984), p.471.Google Scholar
8. Vincenzini, P., Bellosi, A. and Babini, G.N., Ceram. Inter. 12, 133–45 (1986).Google Scholar
9. Tjernlund, A.K., Pompe, R., Holmstrom, M. and Carlsson, R., in Special Ceramics 8, ed. Howlett, S.P. and Taylor, D. (The Institute of Ceramics, Stoke-on-Trent, U.K., 1986), p.29.Google Scholar
10. Cheng, Y. and Thompson, D.P., J.Am.Ceram.Soc., in press.Google Scholar
11. Cheng, Y. and Thompson, D.P., J.Am.Ceram.Soc., 74(5), 1135–8 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Chan, M.Y.H.L., Ph.D Thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, (1987).Google Scholar
13. Liddell, K., M.Sc Thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, (1980).Google Scholar
14. Cheng, Y. and Thompson, D.P., Mater. Forum, in pressGoogle Scholar