Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:05:31.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Origin and Behavior of Main Electron Traps in Si-Implanted GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Z-Q. Fang
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435
H. Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435
D. C. Look
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435
Get access

Abstract

The electron traps in Si-implanted active layers(n∼1017 cm−3) have been studied by capacitance and conductance DLTS techniques in conjunction with different anneal conditions, which include rapid thermal anneals at different temperatures and furnace anneals with a Si3N4 cap or capless in an AsH3 atmosphere. As compared to the electron traps in as-grown bulk n-GaAs (n∼4×1016 cm−3), nearly the same electron traps, i.e. EL2, EL3, ELM, EL5, EL6 and EL9 can be observed in the Si-implanted layers. Through a comparison with the annealing behavior of the main elect ron traps in bulk n-GaAs, the processing associated origins of some of the traps(EL2, EL3, EL4, EL5 and EL9) observed in Si-implanted GaAs layers have been determined. For some Si-implanted GaAs capped with Si3N4 and furnace annealed, traps EL3 and EMA dominate the trap EL2. In such layers it is found that emission due to EL3 is reduced while emission from EL12 is augmented by increasing the filling pulse width from 10 μs to 5×103 μs. This phenomenon can be explained in terms of a defect reaction enhanced by electron capture, showing a metastability or bistability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Koyama, R.Y., Odekirk, B., Vetanen, W.A., Finchem, E.P., and Beers, I.G., in Semi-Insulating ILI-V Materials, Malmo, 1988, edited by Grossmann, G. and Ledebo, L. (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1988), p. 203.Google Scholar
2. Von Neida, A.R., Peaton, S.J., Stavola, M., and Caruso, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 1708 (1986).10.1063/1.97222Google Scholar
3. Hiramoto, T., Mochizuki, Y., Saito, T., and Ikoma, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 24, L921 (1985).10.1143/JJAP.24.L921Google Scholar
4. Crist, J.O. and Look, D.C., J. Electron. Mater. (in press).Google Scholar
5. Kremer, R.E., Arikan, M.C., Abele, J.C., and Blakemore, J.S., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2424 (1987).10.1063/1.339849Google Scholar
6. Fang, Z-Q., Yamamoto, H., Look, D.C., Evans, K.R., and Stutz, C.E., in Semi-Insulating III-V Materials, Toronto, 1990 (to be published).Google Scholar
7. Fang, Z-Q., Schlesinger, T.E., and Milnes, A.G., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 5047 (1987).10.1063/1.338327Google Scholar
8. Wong, D., Kim, H.K., Fang, Z-Q., Schlesinger, T.E., and Milnes, A.G., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 2002 (1989).10.1063/1.344338Google Scholar
9. Kuzuhara, M. and Nozaki, T., J. Appl. Phys. 59, 3131 (1986).10.1063/1.336891Google Scholar
10. Fornari, R., Gombia, E., and Mosca, R., J. Electron. Mater. 18, 151 (1989).10.1007/BF02657401Google Scholar
11. Kang, C.H., Konda, K., Lagowski, J., and Gatos, H.C., J. Electrochem.Soc. 134, 1261(1987).10.1149/1.2100654Google Scholar
12. Levinson, M., Stavola, M., Besomi, P., and Bonner, W.A., Phys. Rev. B 30, 5817 (1984).10.1103/PhysRevB.30.5817Google Scholar