Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:47:37.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orientation Dependence of High Temperature Creep Strength and Internal Stress in Ni3Al Alloy Single Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Seiji Miura
Affiliation:
Precision and Intelligence Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226, Japan.
Zhi-Lun Peng
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226, Japan.
Yoshinao Mishima
Affiliation:
Precision and Intelligence Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226, Japan.
Get access

Abstract

High temperature creep behavior of a nickel-rich Ni3(Al,Ta) with the L12 structure is investigated in order to clarify the influence of crystallographic orientation with respect to the stress axis. The single crystals with four different orientations are deformed in compressive creep at temperatures ranging from ‘M 23 to 1273 K under a constant load, initial shear stress being 35 to 120 MPa for (111)[101] slip system. The results show a distinct orientation dependence of creep strength, although shape of creep curves, stress exponent and the activation energy seem to be independent of the orientation. It is shown, however, the internal stress, being measured by strain transient dip tests, is found to be orientation dependent and the creep behavior is independent on orientation if it is interpreted using the effective stress instead of the applied shear stress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hemker, K.J. and Nix, W.D., Metall. Trans. A, Vol. 24, p. 335 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Caron, P., Khan, T. and Veyssiere, P., Phil. Mag. A, Vol. 60, No. 2, p. 267 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Rong, T.S., Jones, I.P. and Smallman, R.E., Acta metall matter., Vol. 43, No. 4, p. 1385(1995).Google Scholar
4. Shah, D.M., Scripta Metall., Vol. 17, p. 997 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Lall, C., Chin, S. and Pope, D.P., Metall. Trans. A, Vol. 10A, p. 1323 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Ahlquist, C.N. and Nix, W.D., Acta Metall, Vol. 19, p. 373 (1971).Google Scholar
7. Wolfenstine, J., Kim, H.K. and Earthman, J.C., Mat. Sei. Eng. A, Vol. 192/193, p. 811(1994).Google Scholar
8. Hancock, G.F., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), vol. 7, p. 535(1971).Google Scholar
9. Chou, T.C. and Chou, Y.T., MRS Symp. Proc, Vol. 39, p. 461(1985).Google Scholar
10. Hoshino, K., Rothman, S.J. and Averback, R.S., Acta Metall., Vol. 36, p. 1271 (1988).Google Scholar