Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:36:41.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimization of Sol-Gel Film Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Sharon M. Melpolder  and
Bradley K. Coltrain
Sharon M. Melpolder
Affiliation:
Eastman Kodak Company, Corporate Research Laboratories, Rochester, NY 14650.
Bradley K. Coltrain
Affiliation:
Eastman Kodak Company, Corporate Research Laboratories, Rochester, NY 14650.
Get access

Abstract

The preparation and characterization of organic-modified and organic/ iorganic-modified silica sol-gel spin-coated thin films is presented as a function of thermal processing. The ability to alter the film's final refractive index, thermal expansion coefficient and the polar contribution to the film's surface energetic term is reported. The stability of the coating solution at elevated temperatures was studied by analyzing changes in molecular weight, viscosity and particle size during the sol-to-gel transition. Control of the sol-gel thin film properties allows the design of a film/substrate interface where both thermal mismatches and surface energetic differences are minimized. Decreased stresses should be induced during processing, resulting in increased adhesion between the coating and the substrate.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 121: Symposium H – Better Ceramics Through Chemistry III , 1988 , 811
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

sakka, S., Kamiya, K., Makita, K. and Yamamoto, Y., J.Non-Cryst. Solids 63, 223 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dislich, H. and Hinz, P., J.Non-Cryst. Solids 48, 11 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Schmidt, H. and Seiferling, B. in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II. edited by Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E., and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 73. Palo Alto, CA 1986) pp. 739–7–50.Google Scholar
4. Schroeder, H., Phys. Thin Films 5, 87 (1969).Google Scholar
5. Roy, R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 52, 344 (1969).Google Scholar
6. Strawbridge, I. and James, P.F., J.Non-Cryst. Solids 82, 366 (1986);Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Oliver, C.J.R. and Kato, I., J.Non-Cryst. Solids 82, 400 (1986);Google Scholar
Hinz, P. and Dislich, H., J.Non-Cryst. Solids 82, 411 (1986);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Thompson, L.F. and Bowden, K.J. in Introduction to Microllthocrraphy. edited by Thompson, L.F., Willson, C.G., and Bowden, M.J. (ACS Symposium 219 Seattle, WA 1983) pp. 161–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kaeble, D.H., Physical Chemistry of Adhesion. (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1971), p. 152.Google Scholar
9. Ong, E. and Hu, E.L., Solid State Tech., 21 (6), 155 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Ting, C.H. and Liauw, L.K., J. Vac. Sci. Tech., B, (4), 1225 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hamblen, D.P., Lindholm, R., and Melpolder, S.M., Trilevel Resist Processes; Submicron Optical Lithography, to be published.Google Scholar
12. Huang, H., Glaser, R.H. and Wilkes, G.L., Polymer Prep., 23 (1), 434 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Ravine, D., Seminel, A., Charbouillot, Y., and Vincens, H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 32, 210 (1986);Google Scholar
Orgaz, F. and Rawson, H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 32, 378 (1986);Google Scholar
14. Parkhurst, C.S., Doyle, w.F., Silverman, L.A., Singh, S., Anderson, M.P., McClurg, D., Wnek, G.E., and Uhlmann, D.R. in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II. edited by Brinker, C.J., Clark, D.E., and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 72, Palo Alto, Ca 1986) pp. 769–773.Google Scholar