Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:17:30.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontogenetic and Phylogenetic Variation of Form and Function of the Ocular Lens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. G. Sivak
J. G. Sivak*
Affiliation:
School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
Get access

Abstract

The crystalline lens of the eye is a unique optical structure that continues to develop within the eye throughout life. This process of development results in the formation of a lens with a gradient refractive index that has important optical consequences, particularly in the control of spherical aberration. The optical characteristics of the vertebrate crystalline lens are reviewed in terms of environmental concerns and spherical aberration. Lens shape and relative size are determined by such factors as whether the eye is to be used in air or water and whether it is to be used under scotopic or photopic conditions. The continued growth of the lens through life can be related to whether the lens exhibits positive or negative spherical aberration. In general, spherical aberration, as measured using a split laser beam method with excised lenses, is minimized in species with life histories indicating superior resolution ability. In addition, lens optical quality, as indicated by zonular differences in focal length, deteriorates with lens age. While the embryonic and post-embryonic lens undergoes significant change in size, shape and refractive index distribution, it appears that focal constancy is maintained, at least in certain species. This finding may indicate a means of simplifying the process of emmetropization.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 174: Symposium R – Materials Synthesis Utilizing Biological Processes , 1989 , 133
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sivak, J.G., Am. J. Optom. & Physiol. Optics 62, 299 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Bennett, A.G. and Francis, J.L., in The Eye, Vol. 4 Visual Optics and the Optical Space Sense, edited by Davson, H. (Academic Press, New York, 1962), pp. 101–131.Google Scholar
3. Hogan, M.J., Alvarado, J.A., Weddell, J.E., Histology of the Human Eye, (W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1971), p. 55, 638.Google Scholar
4. Worgul, B.V., in Ocular Anatomy, Embryology and Teratology, edited by Jakobiec, F.A. (Harper and Row, Philadelphia, 1982), pp. 355–389.Google Scholar
5. Mann, I., The Development of the Human Eye, (Grune and Stratton, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
6. Tripathi, R.C. and Tripathi, B.J., Gerontology 38, 258 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Spector, A., in Aging and Human Visual Function, edited by Sekuler, R., Kline, D. and Dismukes, K. (A.R. Liss, New York, 1982), pp. 27–43.Google Scholar
8. Helmholtz, H., Albrecht von Graefes Arch. Ophthalmol. 1, 11.Google Scholar
9. Fincham, E.F., Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2, Monogr. Suppl. 8, pp. 1–40 (1855).Google Scholar
10. Weale, R.A., Br. J. Ophthalmol. 46, 660 (1962).Google Scholar
11. Fisher, R.F., J. Physiol. (London) 21, 21 (1969).Google Scholar
12. Fisher, R.F., J. Physiol. (London) 212, 147 (1971).Google Scholar
13. Yeh, S., Scholz, D.L., Lion, W., Rafferty, N.S., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 22, 1535 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Walls, G.L., The Vertebrate Eye and Its Adaptivg Radiation, (Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, 1942).Google Scholar
15. Pumphrey, R.J., in The Cell ad the Organism, edited by Ramsay, J.A. and Wigglesworth, V.B. (Cambridge University Press, London, 1961), pp. 193–208.Google Scholar
16. Matthiessen, L., Arch. Gesamte Physiol. Menschen Tiere 21,287 (1880).Google Scholar
17. Sivak, J.G., Vision Res. 16, 531 (1976).Google Scholar
18. Klinckoström, A., Skand. Arch. Physiol. 5, 67 (1895).Google Scholar
19. Schwassmann, H.O. and Kruger, L., Vision Res. 5, 269 (1965).Google Scholar
20. Sivak, J.G., in The Visual System of Fish, edited by Douglas, R.H. and Djamgoz, M.B.A. (Chapman and Hall, London, 1990) in press.Google Scholar
21. Kuchnow, K.P. and Gilbert, P.W., in Sharks, Skates and Rays, edited by Gilbert, P.W., Mathewson, R.F. and Rail, D.P. (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1967) pp. 465–477.Google Scholar
22. Gilbert, P.W., Sivak, J.G., Pelham, R.E., Can. J. Zool. 52, 560 (1980).Google Scholar
23. Sivak, J.G. and Warburg, M., Can. J. Zool. 5, 2059 (1980).Google Scholar
24. Duke-Elder, S., System of Ophthalmology. Vo1 III, Embryology, (Henry Kimpton, London, 1963).Google Scholar
25. Arey, L.B., in Cataract and Abnormalities of the Lens, (Grune and Stratton, New York, 1975) pp. 42–48.Google Scholar
26. Sivak, J.G. and Dovrat, A., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24, 1162 (1983).Google Scholar
27. Sivak, J.G., in Current Topics in Eye Research, Vol. 3, edited by Zadunaisky, J.A. and Davson, H. (Academic Press, New York, 1980) pp. 281–330.Google Scholar
28. Sivak, J.G., Hildebrand, T. and Lebert, C., Vision Res. 25, 925 (1985).Google Scholar
29. Campbell, M.C.W. and Hughes, A., Vision Res. 21, 1129 (1981).Google Scholar
30. Sivak, J.G. and Kreuzer, R.O., Vision Res. 23, 59 (1983).Google Scholar
31. Sivak, J.G., Gershon, D., Dovrat, A., Weerheim, J., Vision Res. 26, 1873 (1986).Google Scholar
32. Kreuzer, R.O. and Sivak, J.G., J. Comp. Physiol. 154, 415 (1984).Google Scholar
33. Sivak, J.G., Howland, H.C., West, J., Weerheim, J., J. Comp. Physiol. 165, in press (1989).Google Scholar
34. Sivak, J.G., J. Comp. Physiol. 147, 323 (1982).Google Scholar
35. Sivak, J.G. and Dovrat, A., Exp. Biol. 43, 557 (1984).Google Scholar
36. Phillipson, B., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis Sci. 8, 258 (1969).Google Scholar
37. Sivak, J.G. and Dovrat, A., Am. J. Optom. & Physiol. Optics 64, 599 (1987).Google Scholar
38. Sivak, J.G., Ryall, L.A., Weerheim, J., Campbell, M.C.W., Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 30, 967 (1989).Google Scholar