Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:25:51.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Problem of Consistency of Chemical Thermodynamic Data Bases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Hans Wanner*
Affiliation:
OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Data Bank 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Get access

Abstract

The geochemical modelling in support of the performance assessment of radioactive waste disposal systems calls for a large number of chemical thermodynamic data. For realistic modelling it is essential that the data used are fully consistent. The verification of consistency of existing data bases is complicated by the fact that it requires the knowledge of a considerable amount of primary information to ensure:

  1. 1. Consistency with the fundamental laws of thermodynamics

  2. 2. Consistency within a chemical model

  3. 3. Consistency with auxiliary data

  4. 4. Consistency in the data correction procedures

This paper includes selected examples for each of the four items to visualize the problems. It should be noted that there are numerous other systems that could serve as examples as well, and the range of cases reported here is far from being exhaustive.

Realistic geochemical modelling depends not only on the quality of the data base, but also on the quality of the chemical model used. For the establishment of a chemical model, additional information is needed that is not contained in thermodynamic data bases.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wanner, H., The NEA Thermochemical Data Base Project, Radiochim. Acta, 44/45 (1988) 325329.Google Scholar
2. Wanner, H., Standards and conventions for TDB publications, TDB-5.1 (Revision 1), OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Data Bank, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, September 1989.Google Scholar
3. Tasker, I.R., O’Hare, P.A.G., Lewis, B.M., Johnson, G.K., Cordfunke, E.H.P., Thermochemistry of uranium compounds: XVI. Calorimetric determination of the standard molar enthalpy of formation at 298.15 K, low-temperature heat capacity, and high-temperature enthalpy increments of UO2(OH)2 · H2O (schoepite), Can. J. Chem., 66 (1988) 620625.Google Scholar
4. Bruno, J., Sandino, A., The solubility of amorphous and crystalline schoepite in neutral to alkaline aqueous solutions, Sci. Basis Nucl. Waste Manage. XII, held October 1988 in Berlin, FRG, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 127 (1989) 871878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Grenthe, I., Fuger, J., Lemire, R.J., Muller, A.B., Nguyen-Trung, C. and Wanner, H., Chemical thermodynamics of uranium, Paris: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Final draft, March 1990.Google Scholar
6. Myers, R.J., The new low value for the second dissociation constant for H2S, J. Chem. Educ., 63 (1986) 687690.Google Scholar
7. Smith, R.M., Martell, A.E., Critical stability constants: Vol. 4, Inorganic complexes, New York: Plenum Press, 1976, 257p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Grenthe, I. and Wanner, H., Guidelines for the extrapolation to zero ionic strength, TDB-2.1 (Revision 1), OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Data Bank, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, September 1989.Google Scholar