Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:20:15.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Formation of Rapidly Quenched Ti-Pd and Pd-Si Alloys: A Comparison with Mechanically Alloyed Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

C. Politis  and
J. R. Thompson
C. Politis
Affiliation:
Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, INFP, Postfach 3640, D-7500 Karlsruhe, FRG
J. R. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated the formation of amorphous and microcrystalline alloys of Pd-Si and Ti-Pd. In order to allow comparison of the two methods, both liquid quenching (LQ) for rapid solidification and mechanical alloying (MA) techniques were employed. Characterization of the materials was obtained through X-ray diffraction and differential thermal analysis (DTA).

Both the LQ and MA syntheses yielded amorphous Pd80Si20 alloys, with very similar X-ray line widths and crystallization temperaiures. However, the MA alloys contained as minority component a second phase, indexed to Pd3Si.

Quite different results were obtained for the Ti-Pd alloys. LQ splats containing 42, 66, and 80 at % Ti were not amorphous but microcrystalline, as might be expected from the very similar atomic radii of Ti and Pd. In contrast, a broad range of amorphicity, from approximately 42 to 85 at % Ti, was found in the MA synthesized materials. Overall, these results show that the two methods, LQ and MA, differ in the mechanisms of amorphization. This conclusion is further supported by additional MA and LQ experiments on ternary Ti-Pd-Cu alloys.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 80: Symposium G – Science and Technology of Rapidly Quenched Alloys , 1986 , 91
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Benjamin, J. S., Metall. Trans. 1, 2943 (1970).Google Scholar
2. Gilman, P. S. and Benjamin, J. S., Annual Rev. of Mat. Sci. 13, 279 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Koch, C. C., Cavin, O.B., McKamay, C. G., and Scarbrough, J. O., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 1017 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Schwarz, R. B., Petrich, R. R., and Saw, C. K., J. Non-Crystalline Solids 76, 281 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Hellstern, E. and Schultz, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 124 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Politis, C. and Johnson, W. L., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 1147 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Politis, C., Physica 135B, 286 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Moffat, W. G., Handbook of Binary Phase Diagrams, (General Electric, Schenectedy, N.Y., 1984).Google Scholar
9. Buehler, E., P.O. Box 1126, D-7454 Bodelshausen, FRG.Google Scholar
10. Thompson, J. R. and Politis, C., Europhysics Letters (in press).Google Scholar
11. Netzsch-Gerätebau GmbH, 9672 Selb, FRG.Google Scholar
12. JCPDS file 17–369.Google Scholar
13. Wang, R., Bull. Alloy Phase Diag. 2, 269 (1981).Google Scholar
14. Funakoshi, N., Kanamori, T., and Manabe, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 17, 11 (1978).Google Scholar
15. Politis, C. and Thompson, J. R., Proceedings of the Sixth Int. Conf. on Liquid and Amorphous Metals (to be published).Google Scholar
16. Liu, Z., Jin, O., Ma, M., Zhao, Z., and Luo, Q., Chin. Phys. 2, 486 (1982).Google Scholar
17. IJeno, S. and Waseda, Y., in Rapidly Solidified Materials, edited by Lee, P. W. and Carbona, R. S. (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1985), p. 153.Google Scholar