Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:44:10.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Obsidian Hydration Dating - Field, Laboratory, and Modeling Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

B. P. McGrail ,
L. R. Pederson ,
D. M. Strachan ,
R. C. Ewing  and
L. S. Cordell
B. P. McGrail
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA
L. R. Pederson
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA
D. M. Strachan
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA
R. C. Ewing
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
L. S. Cordell
Affiliation:
California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA
Get access

Abstract

Hydration rind thicknesses found on obsidian artifacts provide one means of estimating the age of an archaeological site. The model used in the method usually assumes a diffusion-controlled reaction of the glass with water. However, results using this model are not always in agreement with other dating methods. Observations of secondary mineral formation on glasses in contact with water vapor suggests that other rate-controlling mechanisms may be operative. In this paper, we apply the glass dissolution code GLASSOL, coupled with the geochemical code PHREEQE to model the reaction of Glass Mountain obsidian in water. The results show the importance of accounting for the effects of solution chemistry on the time-dependence of the hydration reaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 125: Symposium N – Materials Stability and Environmental Degradation , 1988 , 393
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Friedman, I. and Smith, R. L., American Antiquity, 25, 477 (1960).Google Scholar
2. Friedman, I. and Long, W., Science, 191, 347 (1976).Google Scholar
3. Michels, J.W., Tsong, I. S. T.,Nelson, C. M., Science, 219, 361 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Moriya, Y., Bull. Inst. Chem. Res., 59, 212 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Diebold, F.E. and Bates, J. K., Glass-Water Vapor Interaction, Advances in Ceramics - Volume 20: Nuclear Waste Management II, edited by Clark, D. E., White, W. B., and Machiels, A. J. (Amer. Cer. Soc., Westerville, OH 1986).Google Scholar
6. Strachan, D. M., Pederson, L. R.,Lokken, R. O., Results from the Long-Term Interaction and Modeling of SRL-131 Glass with Aqueous Solutions. PNL- 5654, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington (1985).Google Scholar
7. Parkhurst, D.L., Thorstenson, D. C., and Plummer, L. N. PHREEQ - A Computer Program for Geochemical Calculations. USGS/WRI-80-9-6, S(U.S Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 1980).Google Scholar
8. Grambow, B., Hermansson, H. P., Bjorner, I. K.,Christensen, H., and Werme, L., in Advances in Ceramics - Volume 20: Nuclear Waste Management II, edited by Clark, D. E.,White, W. B., and Machiels, A. J. (Amer. Cer. Soc., Westerville, OH 1986).Google Scholar
9. Bailey, R.A., Dalrymple, G.B., and Lanphere, M. A.,J. Geophysical Research 81, 725 (1976).Google Scholar
10. Friedman, I. and Trembour, F. W., American Scientist 66, 44 (1976).Google Scholar
11. Frischat, G.H., Ionic Diffusion in Oxide Glasses, (Trans Tech Publications, Bay Village, OH, 1975).Google Scholar
12. Grambow, B., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by Jantzen, C. M.,Stone, J.A., and Ewing, R. C., (Mater. Res. Soc., Pittsburgh, PA 1985).Google Scholar
13. Taylor, R.E., Advances in Obsidian Glass Studies (Noyes Press, Park Ridge, NJ, 1976).Google Scholar
14. Scheetz, B.E. and Stevenson, C. M., American Antiquity 53, 1, 110 (1988).Google Scholar