Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:17:55.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Observations on Faulted Dipoles in Deformed Tial—Based Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Y. Gao
Affiliation:
Central Iron and Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081, P. R. China
J. Zhu
Affiliation:
Central Iron and Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081, P. R. China
Q. G. Cai
Affiliation:
Central Iron and Steel Research Institute, Beijing 100081, P. R. China
Get access

Abstract

The deformation structure of polycrystalline TiAl-based alloys after uniaxial compression at temperature range from 77K to 1073K has been examined using transmission electron microscopy. It was observed that a large number of faulted dipoles are commonly present in deformation structure of the alloys compressed at low temperature 77K and room temperature. The nature of the faulted dipoles has been determined to be intrinsic stacking fault lying on {111} plane, bounded by 1/6<112] partial dislocations. A possible mechanism for the formation of the faulted dipoles was suggested. The results of the statistic observation shows that faulted dipoles in deformed Ti-48A1 and Ti-(47–48) Al-X (X = V,Cr,Mn) alloys are less than those in single phase Ti-52A1 alloy, and the number of the faulted dipoles decreases with increasing deformation temperature. The effect of the faulted dipoles on plastic deformation of the alloy was discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lipsitt, H. A., in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys,ed. by Koch, C. C., Liu, C. T. and Stoloff, N. S., (Mater. Res. Soc. Pro. 39, Pittsburgh, PA 1985), pp351364.Google Scholar
2. Shechtman, D., Blackburn, M. J. and Lipsitt, H. A., Metall. Trans. ,5, 1373 (1974) .Google Scholar
3. Lipsitt, H. A., Shechtman, D. and Schafrik, R. E., Metall. Trans. , 6A, 1991 (1975).Google Scholar
4. Hug, G., Loiseau, A. and Lasalmonie, A., Phil. Mag. A, 54,47(1986).Google Scholar
5. Gevers, R., Art, A. and Amelinckx, S., Phys. Stat. Sol. , 3, 1563(1963).Google Scholar
6. Hirsch, P. B., et al. , Electron Microscopy of Thin Crystals, Krieger, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
7. Hashimoto, H., Howie, A. and Whelan, M. J., Phil. Mag. 5, 967(1962).Google Scholar
8. Baker, I. and Schulson, E. M., Phys. Stat. Sol. a,85,481(1984).Google Scholar
9. Kim, Y-W., Acta Metall. , 40, 1121(1992).Google Scholar
10. Hall, E.L. and Huang, S.C., J. Mater. Res. , 4, 595(1989).Google Scholar
11. Vasudevan, V. K., Stucke, M. A. et. al. , Phil. Mag. Letters,59,299(1989).Google Scholar