Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:58:08.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical Simulation of the Interaction Between Granitic Groundwater, Engineered Clay Barrier and Iron Canister

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L. Trotignon
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Direction du Cycle du Combustible, DESD, Cadarache, France.
M.-H. Faure
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Direction du Cycle du Combustible, DESD, Cadarache, France.
M. Cranga
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Direction du Cycle du Combustible, DESD, Cadarache, France.
H. Peycelon
Affiliation:
UMR 172 CNRS/CEA/Université d'Evry - Analyse et Environnement, France.
Get access

Abstract

The geochemical evolution of a clay engineered barrier subjected simultaneously to granitic groundwater on its external boundary and to a steady flux of iron released by canister corrosion on the other boundary is simulated for time periods up to 1000 y. A multisite ion-exchange model combined with dissolution/precipitation of accessory minerals (calcite, gypsum, quartz, goethite, pyrite, pyrrhotite, iron silicate, magnetite) is used to describe the geochemical evolution of the clay barrier. Diffusive transport of aqueous species and dissolved gases is simulated in a one dimension space. Retroaction of chemical reactions on the corrosion process of the canister is not included in the model. The temperature is assumed to be constant (25°C). Calculations are performed with the IMPACT geochemical coupled code. Two main scenarios are considered: (i) the reduction of sulfates (gypsum) is kinetically hindered, (ii) the reduction of sulfates is possible and leads to the precipitation of sulfides. Main results obtained are dealing with H2(gas) generation and control, pH transient and buffering effect of the clay barrier system. These simulations show that the hydrogen partial pressure in the clay barrier could possibly stay for long periods of time at a very low level due to interactions with mineral buffers or sinks. In the sulfate reduction scenario, a transient pH, xcursion is predicted at the vicinity of the canister. Future developpements of this work include the taking into account of a temperature gradient. Improvement of the geochemical model and reaction pathway is also necessary and will be done with the guidance of on going experimental work.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Cranga, M., Trotignon, L., Martial, C. and Castelier, E. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 506, Davos, 1997) pp. 629636.Google Scholar
[2] Chapman, N. A., McKinley, I. G. and Hill, M. D., The geological disposal of nuclear waste John Wiley, New-York (1987), p.80 Google Scholar
[3] Simpson, J. P. and Schenk, R. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 127, Berlin, 1988) pp. 389396.Google Scholar
[4] Gates, W. P., Wilkinson, H. T. and Stucki, J. W., Clays & Clay Minerals, 41(3),360364 (1993).Google Scholar
[5] Lear, P. R. and Stucki, J. W., Clays & Clay Minerals, 37(6), 547552 (1989)Google Scholar
[6] Yeon, J., Ha, Y., Choi, I. and Chun, K., Proc. Int. Conf. on Deep Disposal of Radioactive Waste, Winnipeg, Canada, pp. 5163, 5-167 (1997)Google Scholar
[7] Lajudie, A., Raynal, J., Petit, J.-C. and Toulhoat, P. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, Kyoto, 1994) pp. 221230 Google Scholar
[8] Gorgeon, , PhD thesis, Univ. Paris VI, France, 1994 Google Scholar
[9] Jacquier, P. and Shibata, M., Sorption properties of a clayey composite material: Fo-Ca 7, presented at the Fifth International Conference on Chemistry and Migration Behaviour of Actinides and Fission Products in the Geosphere – St-Malo – France (Sept. 10-15, 1995).Google Scholar
[10] Honda, A., Teshima, T., Tsurudome, K., Ishikawa, H., Yusa, Y. and Sasaki, N. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, Boston, 1991) pp. 287294 Google Scholar
[11] Anantatmula, R. P. and Fish, R. L. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 84, Boston, 1986) pp. 295306.Google Scholar
[12] Idemitsu, K., Furuya, H. and Inagaki, Y. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI, (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 294, Boston, 1993) pp. 467474.Google Scholar
[13] Blackwood, D. J., Hoch, A. R., Naish, C. C., Rance, A. and Sharland, S. M., SKB Technical report 94/01, Stockholm, Sweden (1994).Google Scholar
[14] Kozaki, T., Imamura, Y., Takada, J., Sato, S. and Ohashi, H. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, Kyoto, 1995) pp. 329336.Google Scholar
[15] Tanigushi, N., Honda, A. and Ishikawa, H. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 506, Davos, 1997) pp. 495501.Google Scholar
[16] Jauzein, M., André, C., Margrita, R., Sardin, M. and Schweich, D., Geoderma, 44, 93113 (1989)Google Scholar
[17] Anderson, G. M. and Crerar, D. A. Thermodynamics in Geochemistry, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993, p. 310.Google Scholar