Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:33:50.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nuclear Waste Package Corrosion Behavior in the Proposed Yucca Mountain Repository

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. A. Sagüés
A. A. Sagüés*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The corrosion performance of spent nuclear fuel waste packages is becoming increasingly important in establishing the viability of the proposed Yucca Mountain repository system. Current package concepts propose the use of a 2 cm thick nickel-base superalloy (Alloy 22) shell as the main barrier to prevent corrosion penetration over many thousands of years. The expected package service conditions, as well as their variability and uncertainty, are discussed. The electrochemical conditions known to be responsible for passive behavior and its breakdown in Alloy 22 and similar alloys are examined in the light of the predicted repository environment. Durability prediction approaches and their conclusions are considered. Efforts to determine the relative impact of localized modes of failure and uniform passive dissolution on package durability are reviewed, along with open issues in need of resolution and alternative package designs. The basic question of the validity of extrapolating corrosion behavior over many times the duration of the present base of experience is addressed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 845
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. “Reference Design Description for a Geologic Repository”, Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Management and Operating Contractor, Las Vegas, NV, B00000000-1717-5707-000002, Revision 00, June 5, 1997 Google Scholar
2. Harrar, J., Carley, J., Isherwood, W. and Raber, E., “Report of the Committee to Review the Use of J-13 Well Water in Nevada Nuclear Waste Storage Investigations”, UCID-21867, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, January 1990.Google Scholar
3. “Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain – Volume 3: Total System Performance Assessment”, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Office, December 1998, DOE/RW-0508/V3.Google Scholar
4. “Assessment of Thermal Loading Strategies for the Yucca Mountain Site”, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, Final Report EPRI TR-108537, November, 1997 Google Scholar
5. Cragnolino, G., Dunn, D., Angell, P., Pan, Y. and Sridhar, N., Paper No. 147, Corrosion/98, NACE International, Houston, 1998.Google Scholar
6. Gdowski, G., Paper No. 151, Corrosion/98, NACE International, Houston, 1998.Google Scholar
7. Andresen, P., Farmer, J., Little, B., McCright, R., Scully, J. and Shoesmith, D. in Waste Package Degradation Expert Elicitation Project, Revision 1, prepared under contract No. DE-AC08-91RW00134 for U.S. Dept. of Energy by Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. and TRW, June 1998.Google Scholar
8. Farmer, J. and McCright, R., Paper No. 160, Corrosion/98, NACE International, Houston, 1998.Google Scholar
9. Roy, A., Fleming, D. and Lum, B., Paper No. 156, Corrosion/98, NACE International, Houston, 1998.Google Scholar
10. Dunn, D., Cragnolino, G. and Sridhar, N., Paper No. 148, Corrosion/98, NACE International, Houston, 1998.Google Scholar
11. McCright, R., presented at Waste Package Degradation Expert Elicitation Panel Meeting, Washington, D.C., Feb. 2, 1998.Google Scholar
12. Gruss, K., Cragnolino, G., Dunn, D. and Sridhar, N., Paper No. 149, Corrosion/98, NACE International, Houston, 1998.Google Scholar
13. Haynes International, Haste/loy C-22 Alloy, Information Brochure H-2019D, 1991.Google Scholar
14. Roy, A., Fleming, D. and Lum, B., Paper No.157, Corrosion/98, NACE Intl., Houston, 1998.Google Scholar
15. Hashimoto, K.in Passivity of Metals and Semiconductors, Ed. by Froment, M., (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1983), p. 235 (see also same author, p. 247)Google Scholar
16. Williams, D., Corrosion Science, 36, p. 12 13 (1994)Google Scholar
17. Macdonald, D., J. Electrochem. Soc., 139, p. 34 34 (1992)Google Scholar
18. Voegele, M. D., “Repository Design Alternatives,” presentation to the U. S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, June 24, 1998, Las Vegas, Nevada.Google Scholar
19. Sato, N., Corrosion Science 31, p.1, (1990)Google Scholar
20. Janik-Czachor, M., Szummer, A. and Hofmann, S., Materials Science Forum 185–188, p. 955 (1995).Google Scholar
21. Wit, J.de, Jansen, E. and Jacobs, L., Materials Science Forum 185–188, p. 975 (1995).Google Scholar
22. Botto, R. and Morrison, G., American Journal of Science, 276, p.241, 1976.Google Scholar
23. Haught, David “Waste Package and Repository Configuration,” presentation at the Waste Package Workshop sponsored by the U. S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, May 18, 1998, Falls Church, Virginia.Google Scholar