Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:47:52.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-Traditional Assessments for New Learning Approaches: Competency Evaluation in Project-Based Introductory Materials Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Jonathan Stolk
Affiliation:
[email protected], Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, Olin Way, Needham, MA, 02492, United States
Steven Krumholz
Affiliation:
Mark Somerville
Affiliation:
Get access

Abstract

Over the last twenty years, NSF and the engineering community have called for systemic changes in engineering education, including an emphasis on contextual understanding; increased teaming skills, including collaborative, active learning; and an improved capacity for life-long, self-directed learning. In addition, ABET has called for engineering graduates that demonstrate an ability to apply science and engineering, and ABET requires assessment processes designed to measure student achievement of learning outcomes. Olin College has responded to these calls for change by embracing new learning approaches and assessment techniques, and by developing project-based courses that encourage experiential understanding of content and aid the development of life-long learning skills. To address the assessment needs of new pedagogical approaches, Olin recently instituted a competency based assessment system to accompany the traditional course grading system already in place. The thread of competency assessments provides grading coherency for both faculty and students, and it provides students with valuable information concerning their development of nontraditional skills that they could use to identify shortcomings and further their learning. In this paper, we describe the new pedagogical approaches in Olin's introductory materials science course, and we explain our implementation of the competency assessment system to measure student attainment of both materials science knowledge and broader skills such as teaming, communication, and experimental inquiry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ASEE Deans Council and Corporate Roundtable, The Green Report: Engineering Education for a Changing World (ASEE, Washington D.C., 1994).Google Scholar
2 NRC Board on Engineering Education, Engineering Education: Designing an Adaptive System (National Academy Press, Washington D.C, 1995).Google Scholar
3 Hung, W., Bailey, J. H., Jonassen, D. H., in Knowlton, D. S. and Sharp, D. C. (eds.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning 5 1323 (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2003).Google Scholar
4 Dochy, F., Segers, M., Bossche, P. Van den, and Gijbels, D., Learning and Instruction 13 533568 (2003).Google Scholar
5 Barrows, H.S., in Wilkerson, L. Gijselaers, W.H. (eds.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68 312 (Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 1996).Google Scholar
6 Liberal Education Outcomes, A Preliminary Report on Student Achievement in College (AACU, 2005).Google Scholar
7 Duch, B. and Groh, S., in The Power of Problem-Based Learning (Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA, 2001) 95106.Google Scholar
8 Somerville, M., Chachra, D., Chambers, J., Cooney, E., Dorsey, K., Geddes, J.B., Pratt, G., Rivard, K., Schaffner, A., Stein, L.A., Stolk, J., Westwood, S., and Zastavker, Y. (35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2005) T1A1 Google Scholar