Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T20:42:18.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonlinear Viscoelastic Deformation in Polymeric Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Shiro Matsuoka*
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Get access

Abstract

The dielectric, mechanical and volumetric relaxation data, and stress-strain data in tension, shear and uniaxial compression for polymeric glasses are compared. The relaxation phenomenon is viewed as a thermodynamically irreversible response to a perturbation in the configurational state. The relaxation behavior is apparently linear only in the limit of a very small perturbation, but otherwise generally nonlinear. Adam-Gibbs' entropy equation [1] has previously been shown to describe the dielectric and volumetric relaxation data better than Doolittle's free volume equation [2]. The temperature and the structure, i.e., history, dependence of mechanical relaxation time is shown to agree with the A-G theory better Than the Doolittle theory, in that the former predicts an Arrhenius type dependence on the temperature when the structural parameter, in this case the entropy, is fixed, while the latter predicts the temperature independence if the fractional free volume is fixed in the glassy state. The temperature dependence of the distribution of relaxation times is shown to agree qualitatively with the dynamic Ising model of Fredrickson and Andersen [3] (F-A model) involving the cooperativity of molecular motions in dense liquids.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Adam, G. and Gibbs, J. H., J. Chem. Phys., 43, 139 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Doolittle, A. K., J. Appl. Phys., 22, 1471 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Fredrickson, G. H. and Andersen, H. C., Phys. Rev. Lett., 53, 1244 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Kovacs, A. J., Stratton, R. A. and Ferry, J. D., J. Phys. Chem., 67, 152 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Moynihan, C. T., Boesch, L. P. and LaBerge, N. L., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 14, 122 (1973).Google Scholar
[6] Narayanaswamy, O. S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 54, 491 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Matsuoka, S.. Williams, G., Johnson, G. E., Anderson, E. W. and Furukawa, T., Macromol., 18, 2652 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Matsuoka, S., J. Rheology, 30 (4), 869 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Hodge, I. M., to be published.Google Scholar
[10] Williams, G. and Watts, D. C., Trans. Faraday Soc., 66, 80 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Kovacs, A. J., Fortschr. Hochpolymer. Forsch., 3, 394 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Matsuoka, S., Bair, H. E. and Bearder, S. S., Polym. Eng. Sci., 18, 1073 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Matsuoka, S., Polymer J. (Japan), 17 (1) 321 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] LeGrand, D. J., private communication.Google Scholar
[15] Struik, L. C. E., “Physical Aging in Amorphous Polymers and Other Materials”, Delft, 1977, TNO Centraal Laboratorium Communication No. 565.Google Scholar