Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:24:25.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonlinear Ultrasonic Parameter in Precipitate-Hardened Steels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

D. C. Hurley
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Boulder, CO 80303, [email protected]
D. Balzar
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Boulder, CO 80303, [email protected] Dept. of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309
P. T. Purtscher
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Boulder, CO 80303, [email protected] Portsmouth Naval Shipyards, Portsmouth, NH 03801
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated several specimens of ASTM A710 steel containing copper-rich precipitates with variations in the final aging treatment. X-ray diffraction line-broadening and small-angle neutron-scattering experiments revealed the existence of the precipitates and associated coherency strain. We determined the nonlinear ultrasonic parameter β for each specimen by harmonic-generation experiments and measured the ultrasonic longitudinal velocity νL and attenuation αL. Although νL and αL showed no consistent trends, β increased with increasing strain. This correlation is compared to a microstructural model for harmonic generation that includes a contribution from precipitate-pinned dislocations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Contribution of NIST, an agency of the US government; not subject to copyright.

References

REFERENCES

1.Odette, G. R. and Lucas, G. E., J. Nondestr. Eval. 15, 137 (1996).Google Scholar
2.McHenry, H. I. and Alers, G. A., “Nondestructive Characterization of Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels: A Feasibility Study,” NIST Technical Note No. 1500–04, 1998.Google Scholar
3.Martin, J. W., Micromechanisms in Particle-Hardened Alloys (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980), pp. 817.Google Scholar
4.Mourik, P. van, Keijser, Th. H. de, Pers, N. M. van deer, and Mittemeijer, E. J., Scripta Met. 22, 1547 (1988).Google Scholar
5.Hollman, K. W. and Fortunko, C. M., Meas. Sci. Technol. 9, 1721 (1998).Google Scholar
6.Papadakis, E. P., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42, 1045 (1967).Google Scholar
7.Papadakis, E. P., Fowler, K. A., and Lynnworth, L. C., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 53, 1336 (1973).Google Scholar
8.Breazeale, M. A. and Philip, J., in Physical Acoustics XVII, edited by Mason, W. P. and Thurston, R. N. (Academic Press, New York, 1984), pp. 160.Google Scholar
9.Hurley, D. C. and Fortunko, C. M., Meas. Sci. Technol. 8, 634 (1997).Google Scholar
10.Thuras, A. L., Jenkins, R. T., and O'Neil, H. T., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 6, 173 (1935).Google Scholar
11.Cantrell, J. H. and Zhang, X.-G., J. Appl. Phys. 84, 5469 (1998).Google Scholar
12.Hikata, A., Chick, B. B., and Elbaum, C., J. Appl. Phys. 36, 229 (1965).Google Scholar
13.Christian, J. W., in The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys (Pergamon Press, New York, 1965), pp. 191193.Google Scholar