Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:29:07.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Noninvasive Diagnosis of Toughening Mechanisms in Fiber Reinforced Concrete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

A. K. Maji
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering, University of New Mexico.
J. L. Wang
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Department of Civil Engineering, University of New Mexico.
Get access

Abstract

Various physical phenomena are involved in the fracture process of steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC). Although pullout of the fiber has been the most intensively investigated parameter in studying the micromechanics of these materials, other mechanisms could be dominant, depending on the nature of the loading and the fiber orientations. Pullout tests were conducted on isolated fibers embedded in a mortar matrix with different orientations to the direction of loading.

The specimens were loaded in the chamber of a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and on an optical table with instrumentation for Laser holographic interferometry (HI). The relative contribution of the various mechanisms, such as: fiber debonding and pullout, mortar crushing, friction at comers, and plastic energy dissipation on the fibers were evaluated. When the specimens were tested in the SEM, it was observed that compressive failure with crushing of the mortar is an important physical phenomenon, in addition to plastic bending of the fiber. HI studies also indicated the crushing of mortar prior to interface debonding.

The relative amounts of energy dissipated by the various mechanisms were evaluated using experimental observations and analytical approximations. The importance of the different mechanisms at progressive stages of fiber pullout was estimated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brandt, A.M. “On the Optimization of the Fiber Orientation in Cement Based Composite Materials”, ACI-SP 81, 1984, pp. 167185.Google Scholar
2. Bentur, A., Diamond, S. and Mindess, S. “Cracking Processes in Steel Fiber Reinforced Cement Paste”, Cement and Concrete Res., 15, 1985, pp. 5159.Google Scholar
3. Cotterell, A.H. “Strong Solids”, Proc. Royal Soc., A 282, No. 2, 1964, pp. 29.Google Scholar
4. Jacquot, P. and Rastogi, P.K. “Speckle Metrology and Holographic Interferometry Applied to the Study of Cracks in Concrete”, in ‘Fracture Mechanics of Concrete’, Ed: Wittmann, F.H., 1983, Elsevier Science Publisher, pp. 113155.Google Scholar
5. Maage, M. “Steel Fiber Bond Strengths in Cement-Based Matrices Influenced by Surface Treatment”, Cement and Concrete Res., V 7, 1977, pp. 703710.Google Scholar
6. Maji, A.K. and Shah, S.P. “Application of Acoustic Emission and Laser Interferometry to Study Microfracture in Concrete”, ACI-SP 112, 1988, pp. 83.Google Scholar
7. Naaman, A.E. and Shah, S.P. “Pull-out Mechanism in Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete”, ASCE J. of Structures Div., 1976, p. 15371548.Google Scholar
8. Potrzebowski, J. “Investigation of Steel Fiber Debonding Process in Cement Paste”, in ‘Bond in Concrete’, Ed: Bartos, P.. Applied Science Publ., 1982, pp. 5159.Google Scholar
9. Shah, S.P. and Rangan, B.V. “Fiber Reinforced Concrete Properties”, ACI Journal, 1971, pp. 126135.Google Scholar
10. Soroushian, P. and Bayashi, Z. “Prediction of the Tensile Strength of Fiber Reinforced Concrete: A Critique of the Composite Material Concept”, ACI-SP 105, 1987, pp. 71.Google Scholar
11. Stroeven, P. “Holographic Interferometry Approach to a Study of Debonding in Plain and Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete”, Proc. SEM Spring Conf., 1989, pp. 689696.Google Scholar
12. Swamy, R.N. and Mangat, P.S. “The Interfacial Bond Stress in Steel Fiber Cement Composites”, Cement and Concrete Research, V 6, 1976, pp. 641649.Google Scholar