Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:02:30.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-Destructive Analysis of Thin III-V Epitaxial Layers Using a Tabletop Double Crystal X-Ray Diffractometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

R. N. Sacks*
Affiliation:
United Technologies Research Center, Silver Lane, E. Hartford, CT 06108
Get access

Abstract

Some of today's most promising and interesting semiconductor devices use only a few thin epitaxial layers of III-V materials, where each layer may be only 100 to 1,000A thick. There is a need for fast, accurate, non-destructive analysis techniques for these structures. Double-crystal x-ray diffraction has proven to be an excellent method for measuring composition, thickness, interface sharpness, and overall crystalline quality of III-V heterostructures. Data is presented on the use of a Bede QC1 automated table-top double-crystal diffractometer for the analysis of (AI,Ga)As, (ln,Ga)As, and GaAs epitaxial layers grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE). It is shown that this technique can directly detect and analyze single layers of (In,Ga)As as thin as 200A, and in some cases, can indirectly detect layers of GaAs or (AI,Ga)As as thin as 100A without unusual measures such as glancing angle diffraction. The rocking curve results are compared with values predicted by RHEED intensity oscillation measurements, and with computer simulations using a commercial software package.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Tanner, B. K., J. Electrochem. Soc. 136, 3438 (1989)Google Scholar
[2] Bassignana, I. C. and Thn, C. C., J. Appl. Cryst. 22, 269 (1989)Google Scholar
[3] Bede Scientific Instruments Ltd., Bowburn, Durham, EnglandGoogle Scholar
[4] Neave, J. H., Joyce, B. A., Dobson, P. J., and Norton, N., Appl. Phys. A 31, 1 (1983)Google Scholar
[5] Fewster, P.F and Curling, C. J., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 4154 (1987)Google Scholar
[6] Thnski, W J., Sacks, R. N., Merritt, S.W, Cullen, D. E., Branciforte, E. J., Eschrich, T C., and Carroll, R. D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8, 352 (1990)Google Scholar