Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:09:45.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

No Need To Dry - Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy Of Hydrated System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Athene M Donald
Athene M Donald*
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
Get access

Abstract

The environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) offers a new approach for the examination of biological samples at rather high resolution. It permits samples to be imaged without extensive specimen preparation, and specifically requires neither drying nor coating. This implies that organic samples can be looked at in their native state, without the danger of artefacts being introduced. A few specific examples both of static imaging, and also images obtained during dynamic mechanical testing are given in this article to illustrate the power of the technique.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 711: Symposia FF/GG/HH – Advanced Biomaterials--Characterization, Tissue Engineering and Complexity , 2001 , FF6.1.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Danilatos, D, J. Microscopy 162, 391–402 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Thiel, B L, Bache, I C, Fletcher, A L Meredith, P and Donald, A M., J. Microscopy 187, 143–157 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Toth, M, Phillips, M, Thiel, B.L. and Donald, A M, J Appl Phys, in press.Google Scholar
4. Cameron, R E and Donald, A M, J Micros 173, 227–237 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Paredes-Lopez, O and Bushuk, W, Cer Chem 30, 24–7 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Amend, T and Belitz, H-D, Food Structure 10, 277–88 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Bache, I.C and Donald, A.M, “Cer Sci 28, 127–33 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Stokes, D J, Thiel, B L, and Donald, A M, Langmuir 14, 4402–8 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Tromp, H R, Jones, R A L, and Rennie, A R, Macromols 28, 4129–38 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Meredith, P, Donald, A M, and Luke, K, J Mat Sci. 39, 1921–30 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Meredith, P and Donald, A M, J Micros 181, 23–35 (1996).Google Scholar
12. He, C and Donald, A M, Langmuir 12, 6250–6 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Jenkins, L M and Donald, A M, Langmuir 15, 7829–7835. (1999).Google Scholar
14. Poon, W, McLeish, T C B, and Donald, A M, Physics World 14 (5), 33–38 (2001).Google Scholar
15. Callow, J A, Osborne, M P, Callow, M E, Baker, F, Donald, A M, to be submitted.Google Scholar
16. Leuschner, R G K, Ferdinando, D P, and Lillford, P J, Colls and Surf B 19, 31–41 (2000).Google Scholar
17. Bos, H L and Donald, A M, J Mat Sci 34, 3029–34 (1999).Google Scholar
18. Warner, M and Edwards, S F, Europhys. Letts. 5, 623 (1988).Google Scholar
19. Warner, M, Thiel, B.L., and Donald, A.M., Proc Nat Acad Sci 97, 1370–5 (2000).Google Scholar
20. Thiel, B L and Donald, A M, Annals of Botany 82, 727–33 (1998).Google Scholar