Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:23:52.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Technology and Developments in Compound Semiconductor Vertical RDR-MOCVD Growth Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

M. McKee
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, 35 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873
G.S. Tompa
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, 35 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873
P.A. Zawadzki
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, 35 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873
A. Thompson
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, 35 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873
A. Gurary
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, 35 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873
C. Beckham
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, 35 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873
N.E. Schumaker
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, 35 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873
K. Moy
Affiliation:
EMCORE Corporation, 35 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873
Get access

Abstract

Compound semiconductors are at the heart of todays advanced digital and optoelectronic devices. As device production levels increase, so too does the need for high throughput deposition systems. The vertical rotating disk reactor (RDR) has been scaled to dimensions allowing metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) on multiple substrates located on a 300 mm diameter platter. This symetric large area reactor affords easy access over a wide range of angles for optical monitoring and control of the growth process. The RDR can be numerically modeled in a straightforward manner, and we have derived scaling rules allowing the prediction of optimum process conditions for larger reactor sizes. The material results give excellent agreement with the modeling, demonstrating GaAs/AlAs structures with <±0.9% thickness uniformities on up to 17-50mm or 4-100mm GaAs substrates. Process issues related to reactor scaling are reviewed. With high reactant efficiencies and short cycle times between growths, through the use of a vacuum loadlock, the costs per wafer are found to be dramatically less than in alternative process reactors. The high reactant utilization, in combination with a dedicated and highly efficient exhaust scrubbing system, minimizes the systems environmental impact.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Biber, C., et al, J. of Crystal Growth, 123 (1992) p. 545554;Google Scholar
[2] Breiland, W.G. and Evans, G.H., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 (6) (1991) p. 18061816.Google Scholar
[3] Tompa, G.S., et. al, J. Crystal Growth, 93 (1988) p. 220227.Google Scholar
[4] Davis, R.W., Moore, E.F., and Zachariah, M.R., J. of Crystal Growth, 132 (1993) 513522.Google Scholar
[5] Fotiadis, D.I., Kieda, S. and Jensen, K.F., J. Crystal Growth, 102 (1990) p. 441470.Google Scholar
[6] Gurary, A.I., Tompa, G.S., Thompson, A.G., Stall, R.A., Zawadzki, P., and Schumaker, N.E., Presented at ICOMVPE-VII, Japan, 5/31/94 Abstract P3-1; A.I. Gurary, G.S. Tompa, K. Moy and P. Zawadzki,.MRS Spring Meeting, 1994, paper E1,6.Google Scholar
[7] Wu, Y.A. et at, 51st IEEE Device Res. Conf, paper IIIB-3, 1993.Google Scholar
[8] Schneider, R.P. and Lott, J.A., Electron. Lett. 20, 830 (1993.Google Scholar
[9] Yeh, P., “Optical Waves in Layered Media”, Wiley, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
[10] Adachi, S., “Properties of GaAs”, Inspec (EMIS Datareview #2), p513, 1990.Google Scholar
[11] Tompa, G.S., Zawadzki, P.A., Moy, K., McKee, M., Thompson, A., Stall, R.A., Gurary, A., Schumaker, N.E., Esherick, P., Breiland, W.G., and Evans, G.H. Proceedings of U.S. Conference on GaAs Manufacturing Technology, in press, 1994.Google Scholar
[12] Thompson, A.G., Tompa, G.S., Zawadzki, P.A., McKee, M., Beckham, C., Powers, A., Gurary, A., Moy, K., Schumaker, N.E., MRS Spring Meeting 1994, paper 15.1, and references contained therein.Google Scholar
[13] Dallasasse, J.M. et al, J. Appl. Phys. 66 (2) 1989; 482-487; N. Holonyak Jr., et al, App. Phys. Lett., 54 (11) 1989 p. 1022–1024., G.S. Tompa et al, J. Crystal Growth 93 (1988) 228.Google Scholar
[14] Anderson, P.L. et al, J. of Crystal Growth, in press 1994; G.S. Tompa et. al, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55 (62) (1989(; G.S. Tompa et al, J. Crystal Growth 107 (1991) p. 1198–202.Google Scholar
[15] Yooung, K.H., et al, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 (5) 1992; W.J. DeSisto et. al, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 (23) 1992; Zawadzki, P.A., J. Elec. Mat. V19 N4 (1990) p 357-362.Google Scholar
[16] Stall, R.A. et al, Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. ULSI-VII 1992 P.115121; G.S. Tompa et al, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. V 282 (1993) p.323-328.Google Scholar