Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:34:19.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Local Electronic Stopping Model for the Monte Carlo Simulation of Arsenic Ion Implantation into (100) Single-Crystal Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S.-H. Yang
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
S. Morris
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
S. Tian
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
K. Parab
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
A. F. Tasch
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
P. M. Echenique
Affiliation:
Departmento De Fisica De Materiales, Universidad Del Pais Vasco, San Sebastian, 20080, Spain.
R. Capaz
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
J. Joannopoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Get access

Abstract

In this paper is reported the development and implementation of a new local electronic stopping model for arsenic ion implantation into single-crystal silicon. Monte Carlo binary collision (MCBC) models are appropriate for studying channeling effects since it is possible to include the crystal structure in the simulators. One major inadequacy of existing MCBC codes is that the electronic stopping of implanted ions is not accurately and physically accounted for, although it is absolutely necessary for predicting the channeling tails of the profiles. In order to address this need, we have developed a new electronic stopping power model using a directionally dependent electronic density (to account for valence bonding) and an electronic stopping power based on the density functional approach. This new model has been implemented in the MCBC code, UT-MARLOWE The predictions of UT-MARLOWE with this new model are in very good agreement with experimentally-measured secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) profiles for both on-axis and off-axis arsenic implants in the energy range of 15-180 keV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Posselt, M., Conf. Computer Simulation Rad. Eff. Sol. Tech. Pgm. with abstracts, 125, July, (1994).Google Scholar
2 Lindhard, J. and Scharf, M., Phys., Rev., 124, 128, (1961).Google Scholar
3 Firsov, O. B., Sov. Phys. JETP, 36, 1076, (1959).Google Scholar
4 al., B. Blanchard el, Mat. Res., 6, 1283, (1971).Google Scholar
5 Furukawa, S. and Ishiwara, H., J. Appl. Phys., 43, 295, (1972).Google Scholar
6 Wilson, R. G., J. Appl. Phys., 54, 6879, (1983).Google Scholar
7 Klein, K. et al. ., Electrochem. Soc. Spring Mtg., Extended Abstracts, 357, (1990).Google Scholar
8 Yang, S.-H.,Morris, S.,Lim, D., ,and Tasch, A., J. Electronic Mat., 23, 801, (1994).Google Scholar
9 Azziz, N.,Brannon, K., ,and Srinivasan, G., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., 45, 71, (1985).Google Scholar
10 Klein, K.,Park, C., and Tasch, A., Appl. Phys. Lett., 57, 2701, (1990).Google Scholar
11 Hobler, G. et al. , COMPEL, 10, 323, (1991).Google Scholar
12 Brandt, W., Nucl. Inst. Meth., 194, 13, (1981).Google Scholar
13 Echenique, P. M.,Nieminen, R. M., ,and Ritchie, R. H., Solid State Comm., 37, 779, (1981).Google Scholar
14 Golovchenko, J. A.,Cox, D. E.,Goland, A. N., Phys. Rev. B, 26, 2335, (1982).Google Scholar
15 Ziegler, J. F.,Biersack, J. P., ,and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, vol. 1, (Pergamon, New York, 1985)Google Scholar
16 Klein, K.,Park, C., ,and Tasch, A., IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., 39, 1614, (1992).Google Scholar
17 Barberan, N. and Echenique, P. M., J. Phys. B, 19, L81, (1986).Google Scholar
18 Echenique, P. M. and Uranga, M. E., Interaction of Charged Particles with Solids and Surfaces, NATO SERIES, 271, 39, (Plenum, 1991).Google Scholar
19 Echenique, P. M.,Nieminen, R. M.,Ashley, J. C., ,and Ritchie, R. H., Phys, Rev. A, 33, 397, (1986).Google Scholar
20 Wolfe, R.,Needels, M.,Arias, T. and Joannopoulos, J., IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 45, (1992).Google Scholar