Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:29:43.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Near-Field Chemical Composition of Porewaters in a Near-Surface Low-Level Radioactive Waste Vault

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

F. Caron
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Environmental Research Branch, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, ON, KOJ 1J0, [email protected].
M. K. Haas
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Environmental Research Branch, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, ON, KOJ 1J0, [email protected].
G. Manni
Affiliation:
CANDU Operations, Sheridan Park 2285 Speakman Dr. Mississauga, ON, L5K 1B2
J. Torok
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Waste technology, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, ON, KOJ 1J0, [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

A long-term waste degradation experiment has been performed with actual low-level radioactive wastes (LLRW) at the Chalk River Laboratories (CRL), to support the licensing and modelling efforts for near-surface disposal. The wastes consist of paper, mop heads, paper towels, used clothing, etc. The wastes were compacted into bales and sealed into separate steel containers, which were connected to leachate collection systems for sampling. The leachates collected had a composition typical of landfill leachates. The major inorganic ions were Na, Ca, Cl, and Fe, and the ionic strength was ∼0.05 M. The relative distribution of inorganic ions in the leachates was remarkably similar between bales. Volatile fatty acids (VFA) were the major species of dissolved organic carbon (DOC, total DOC up to 7000 mg/L). A typical composition of leachates is proposed, which can be used in geochemical and source term modelling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Haas, M. K., Marini, G., Carón, F., Torok, J., Description and analytical methods used in Low- level waste leaching experiment. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River Laboratories. Report No. TR-662, 1996*Google Scholar
2. Caron, F., Torok, J., Haas, M.K., Manni, G., These Proceedings, 1996.Google Scholar
3. Torok, J. and Haas, M. K., in Gas Generation and Release From Radioactive Waste Repositories, workshop held Sept. 23–26, 1991, Aix-en-Provence, France. (NEA, OECD, Paris, France, 1992), pp. 175187.Google Scholar
4. Manni, G. and Caron, F., J. Chromatogr 690, 237 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Dayal, R., Pietrzak, R. F., and Clinton, J. H., Nucl. Technol. 72, 158 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Ehrig, H.-J., Waste Manag. Res. 1, 53 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Woods, B. L., Physical properties of backfill materials selected for use in a low-level waste repository. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River Laboratories Report No. TR-259, 1986*Google Scholar
8. Stephens, D. B. and Coons, L. M., Ground Water Monit. Remed. 14, 101 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Sheppard, M. I., Thibault, D. H., and Rowat, J. H., Predictions of average moisture content and capillary rise of the candidate sand and clinoptilolite for the LRUS disposal concept. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Laboratories, 1995*Google Scholar
10. Peterson, S. R., Hostetler, C.J., Deutsch, W.J., Cowan, C.E., MINTEO user manual. Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report No. NUREG/CR-4808; PNL-6106, 1987.Google Scholar
11. Lisk, D. J., Sci. Tot. Environ. 100, 415 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Caron, F., Dissolved Organic Matter in Low-Level Waste Leachates: first year of activities. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River Laboratories, Report No. TR-560 (COG-93–100), 1994*Google Scholar
13. Caron, F., Elchuk, S., and Walker, Z. H., J. Chromatogr. 739, 281 (1996).Google Scholar
14. Weis, M., Abbt-Braun, G., and Frimel, F. H., Sci. Tot. Environ. 81/82, 343 (1989).Google Scholar
15. Frimmel, F. H. and Weis, M., Wat. Sci. Tech. 23, 419 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Castagnoli, O., Musmeci, L., Zavattiero, E., Chirico, M., Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 53, 1 (1990).Google Scholar