Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:56:18.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nde of Tendon Ducts in Concrete Using 3D-Saft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. Krause
Affiliation:
Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Division VII.3, 12205 Berlin, Germany, [email protected] / [email protected]
H. Wiggenhauser
Affiliation:
Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Division VII.3, 12205 Berlin, Germany, [email protected] / [email protected]
W. Müller
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Non-Destructive Testing, University, Building 37, 66123 Saarbrüicken, Germany, [email protected] / [email protected]
V. Schmitz
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Non-Destructive Testing, University, Building 37, 66123 Saarbrüicken, Germany, [email protected] / [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Prestressed or post-tensioned concrete structures are vulnerable to hazardous corrosion, if the tendon ducts are not fully injected with grout. Also compaction faults reduce the concrete strength. Advanced ultrasonic testing techniques and data analysis have been utilized to evaluate ducts in concrete members nondestructively. A laser Doppler vibrometer is used as an ultrasonic receiver to automatically collect the data. With this method ducts could be investigated which are not accessible by other methods as radiography or impact-echo. Encouraging results on different specimens are presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kroggel, O., Jansohn, R. und Ratmann, M. in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Structural Faults and Repair, Vol. 1, edited by Forde, M. C. (Engineering Technics Press, London, 1995), pp. 203208.Google Scholar
2. Schickert, M. in: Proceedings of the International Symposium Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT-CE) edited by Schickert, G. and Wiggenhauser, H. (DGZfP, Berlin, 1995), pp. 411418.Google Scholar
3. Wollboldand, F. and Neisecke, J. in: Proceedings of the International Symposium Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT-CE) edited by Schickert, G. and Wiggenhauser, H. (DGZfP, Berlin, 1995), pp. 11351143.Google Scholar
4. Krause, M., Bärmann, R., Frielinghaus, R., Kretzschmar, F., Kroggel, O., Langenberg, K. J., Maierhofer, C., Müller, W., Neisecke, J., Schickert, M., Schmitz, V., Wiggenhauser, H. and Wollbold, F., NDT&E International 30, 195 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Krause, M., and Müller, W. Wiggenhauser, H., Acoustical Imaging 23 (1998), in press.Google Scholar
6. Krieger, J., Krause, M. and Wiggenhauser, H., Anwendung von zerstörungsfreien Prüfmethoden bei Betonbrücken (BASt, Bergisch Gladbach, 1998), in press.Google Scholar
7. Schmitz, V., Kröning, M. and Langenberg, K. J., Acoustical Imaging 22 (1996) 735.Google Scholar
8. Schmitz, V. and Müller, W., Acoustical Imaging 23 (1998), in press.Google Scholar
9. Krause, M., Wiggenhauser, H. in NDT in Civil Engineering 8–11 April 1997, Conference Proceedings, edited by Bungey, J. H. (The British institute of NDT, Northampton, 1997), pp. 135142.Google Scholar