Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:55:52.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nano-Scale Mechanical Characterization of Plasma Treated Polymer Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Dahl
Affiliation:
Groupe des Couches Minces (GCM) and Department of Engineering Physics and Materials Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Qc, H3C 3A7, Canada.
J. E Klemberg-Sapieha
Affiliation:
Groupe des Couches Minces (GCM) and Department of Engineering Physics and Materials Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal, Qc, H3C 3A7, Canada.
Get access

Abstract

Recent advances in atomic force microscopy (AFM) allow one to perform complex analysis of materials surfaces and near-surface regions with a nanometer scale resolution; this includes the imaging of surface topography and the measurements of stiffness, elasticity, hardness and nano-tribological characteristics. Understanding of the complex AFM response is still in its early stage, and it frequently requires the use of multiple complementary techniques. In the present work we have applied AFM for the study of the surface and nearsurface mechanical properties of plasma-treated polycarbonate. The results from AFM analysis, such as the stiffness and the relative Young modulus, were compared with the hardness values obtained by depth-sensing indentation and by the micro-scratch technique. The characteristics of the observed hardened surface layer are discussed with respect to the role of the “interphase” in adhesion en1hancement of plasma-deposited films on polymers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Khurshudov, A. and Kato, K., Wear 205, 1 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Bhushan, B. and Kulkami, A. V., Thin Solid Films 278, 49 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Weisenhorn, A. L., Khorsandi, M., Kasas, S., and Gotzos, V., and Butt, H.-J., Nanotechnology 4, 106 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Nie, H.-Y., Motamatsu, M., Mizutani, W., and Tokumoto, H., Thin Solid Films 273, 143 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Bushan, B. and Koinkar, V. N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1653 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Liston, E.M., Martinu, L., and Wertheimer, M.R., J. Adh. Sci. Technol. 7, 1091 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Martinu, L., in Plasma Treatments and Deposition of Polymers, edited by d’Agostino, R., Fracassi, F., and Favia, P.,. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997), p. 247.Google Scholar
8. Bergeron, A., Klemberg-Sapieha, J. E., and Martinu, L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 3227 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Wertheimer, M. R., Martinu, L., Klemberg-Sapieha, J.E., and Czeremuszkin, G., in Adhesion Promotion Techniques, edited by Pizzi, A. and Mittal, K.L. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999), p. 173.Google Scholar
10. Klemberg-Sapieha, J.E., Poitras, D., Martinu, L., Yamasaki, N.L.S., and Lantman, C. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 985 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Magonov, S. N. and Reneker, D. H., Annu. Rev. Mat. Sci. 27, 175 (1997).Google Scholar
12. Blau, P. J., ASTM Handbook 18, 414 (1992).Google Scholar