Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:48:20.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanoindentation of Atomically Modified Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Sean G. Corcoran
Affiliation:
Hysritron, Inc., Nanomechanics Res. Lab, 2010 E. Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55413
Stanko R. Brankovic
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Tempe, AZ.85287
Nikolay Dimitrov
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Tempe, AZ.85287
Karl Sieradzki
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Tempe, AZ.85287
Get access

Abstract

Nanoindentation studies on metal and semiconducting surfaces often display excursions in the load-displacement curves. These displacement excursions have been attributed to phase transitions, oxide breakthrough, surface contamination effects, and dislocation nucleation under the indenter tip. We have shown recently that displacement excursions were present for nanoindentation on single crystal Au (111), (110) and (100), and were attributed to dislocation nucleation since all other phenomena were ruled out. We present our recent results that have been aimed at understanding the effects of surface modification at the nanoscale on dislocation nucleation. The effects of modifying the Au surface with electrochemically deposited metal monolayers (Pb and Ag), with an electrochemically deposited oxide monolayer and an electrochemically reconstructed surface will be presented. Hardness differences as great as a factor of 3 have been observed for these surfaces. These experiments are unique in that they were carried out under electrochemical control where strict control of the surface cleanliness can be maintained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Gane, N. and Bowden, F. P., J. Appl. Phys., 39, 1432 (1968).Google Scholar
2.Corcoran, S. G., Colton, R., Lilleodden, E. T., Gerberich, W. W., Phys. Rev. B, 55, R16057, 1997.Google Scholar
3.Gerberich, W. W., Nelson, J. C., Lilleodden, E. T., Anderson, P., and Wyrobek, J. T., Acta. Metall.Mater., 44 (9), 3585 (1996).Google Scholar
4. For an explanation of surface stress see for example, Cammarata, R. C., Progress in Surface Science, 46, 1 (1994).Google Scholar
5. See the following reviews, Kolb, D. M., in Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Engineering, ed. Gerischer, H. and Tobias, Ch. W. (Wiley, New York, 1978), 11, p. 125; K. Jüttner and W. J. Lorenz, Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie Neue Folge, 122, 163 (1980).Google Scholar
6.Tao, N. J. and Lindsay, S. M., J. Appl. Phys., 170, 5143 (1991); X. Gao, A. Hamelin, and M. J. Weaver, J. Chem. Phys., 95, 6993 (1991).Google Scholar
7.Kolb, D. M., Progress in Surf. Sci., 51, 109 (1996).Google Scholar
8.Mann, A. B. and Pethica, J. B., Materials Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 436, 153 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Monocrystals, Inc. Cleveland, OHGoogle Scholar
10.Clavilier, J., Faure, R., Guinet, G., and Durand, R., J. Electroanal. Chem., 107, 205 (1980).Google Scholar
11. See for example, Angerstein-Kozlowska, H., Conway, B. E., Hamelin, A. and Stoicoviciu, L., J. Electroanal. Chem., 228, 429 (1987).Google Scholar