Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:34:13.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multilayer Relaxations of the Clean Nickel Aluminum (110) Surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S. M. Yalisove  and
W. R. Graham
S. M. Yalisove
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania Department of Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory for the Research on the Structure of Matter Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
W. R. Graham
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania Department of Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory for the Research on the Structure of Matter Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Get access

Abstract

The multilayer relaxations of the clean NiAl(II0) surface have been measured using Medium Energy Ion Scattering in a Channeling and Blocking (MEIS/CB) experiment. A high sensitivity to the first layer ripple (10% ripple with the Al on top) is reported and a multilayer model is proposed. The present results are in excellent agreement with a recent single layer LEED intensity analysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 83: Symposium J – Physical and Chemical Properties of Thin Metal Overlayers and Alloy Surfaces , 1986 , 39
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Liu, C.T., White, C.L., Koch, C.C., and Lee, E.H., Proc. Sym. High Temperature Materials Chemistry II, Munir, Z.A. and Cubicciotti, D. (eds.), The Electrochemical Society, 32 (1983).Google Scholar
2. White, C.L., Padgett, R.A., Liu, C.T., and Yalisove, S.M., Scripta Mettall. 18 1417 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. White, G.L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 4(3) 1633 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Davis, H.L. and Noonan, J.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 566 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Davis, H.L. and Noonan, J.R., J. Vac. Sci. and Tech. 3(3) 1507 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Yalisove, S.M., Graham, W.R., Adams, E.D., Gustafsson, T., and Copel, M., Surf. Sci. 171 400 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Graham, W.R., Yalisove, S.M., Adams, E.D., Gustafsson, T., Copel, M., and Törnqvist, E., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B16 383 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Gaylord, R.H., Mundenar, J.M., Ford, W.K., and Plummer, E.W., submitted to Surface Science.Google Scholar
9. Van Der Veen, J.F., Surf. Sci. Reports, 5 199 (1895).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kuk, Y., and Feldman, L.C., Phys. Rev. B 30 5811 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Frenken, J.W.M., PhD thesis, FOM Institute, 1986.Google Scholar
12. Mele, E., private communicationGoogle Scholar
13. Noonan, J.R. and Davis, H.L., Science 234 310 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. , Chen et. al. 1986 Google Scholar