Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:17:25.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moving Steps and Crystal Defects on Spinel Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

S.V. Yanina
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
C.B. Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

The morphology of the reconstructed {001} surface of MgAl2O4 spinel is studied by scanning probe microscopy (SPM). The observations show that the {001} surface of MgAl2O4 may exist as two variants which are related through 90° rotation about the [001] axis. These surface variants exhibit different lateral forces and tend to grow/evaporate and to etch anisotropically along either the [110] or the [110] directions of the crystal. Surface terraces that are formed by different variants were found to be separated by ∼2.0 Å-high steps, while the terraces which belong to the same variant are separated by ∼4.0 Å-high steps. It is expected that the origins of the preferential motion of ledges on the {001} spinel surface is related to the anisotropic distribution of cations along either the [110] or the [110] directions within the {001} crystal planes in the spinel crystal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Naoe, M., Matsushita, N., Noma, K., and Nakagawa, S., J. de Physique IV 7, C1735 (1997).Google Scholar
[2] Villars, P. and Calvert, L.D., Pearson's Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases, American Society for Metals, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, 1989.Google Scholar
[3] Tasker, P.W., J. Phys. C 12, 4977 (1979).Google Scholar
[4] Wolf, D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3315 (1992).Google Scholar
[5] Tarrach, G., Bürgler, D., Schaub, T., Weisendanger, R., and Günterodt, H.-J., Surf. Sci. 285, 1 (1993).Google Scholar
[6] Frank, F.C., Disc. Faraday Soc. 5, 48 (1949).Google Scholar
[7] Mitchell, T.E., Donlon, W.T., Lagerlof, K. P. D., and Hauer, A.H. in Structure of Dislocations in Oxides, edited by Tressler, R.E. and Brandt, R.C. (Plenum Press, New York, 1984), pp. 125139.Google Scholar
[8] Hirth, J.P. and Pound, G.M., J. Chem. Phys. 26, 1216 (1957).Google Scholar
[9] Yanina, S.V. and Carter, C.B., in preparation.Google Scholar