Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:28:14.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular Beam Deposition of Organic Nonlinear Optical Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. Schlesser
Affiliation:
Nonlinear Optics Laboratory, Institute of Quantum Electronics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, CH-8093 Zuirich, Switzerland
T. Dietrich
Affiliation:
Nonlinear Optics Laboratory, Institute of Quantum Electronics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, CH-8093 Zuirich, Switzerland
Z. Sitar
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Materials Research Center, Raleigh, NC 27695-7919, USA
P. Günter
Affiliation:
Nonlinear Optics Laboratory, Institute of Quantum Electronics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, CH-8093 Zuirich, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

Thin films of the organic nonlinear optical materials 4‘-nitrobenzylidene-3-acetamino-4- methoxy-aniline (MNBA), and 2-cyclooctylamino-5-nitropyridine (COANP) have been deposited by organic molecular beam epitaxy. Homoepitaxial growth has been demonstrated for both materials. MNBA thin films were grown heteroepitaxially on lattice-matched ethylenediammonium terephthalate (EDT) substrates. Under optimum growth conditions, similar to those valid for homoepitaxial growth of the same material, i.e. at substrate temperatures of 80°C, and growth rates of 0.1 Å/s, highly oriented films were deposited in an island growth mode. Nonlinear optical second-harmonic generation experiments confirmed the macroscopic orientation of the deposited MNBA thin films. Growth experiments with MNBA and COANP on inorganic substrates lead to amorphous or polycrystalline films, depending primarily on the substrate temperature. A spontaneous recrystallization process, occurring in COANP thin films under ambiant conditions, led to the formation of macroscopic nonlinear optically active domain structures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bosshard, C., Sutter, K., Gtinter, P., and Chapuis, G., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6 (4), 721–5 (1989)Google Scholar
2. KnÖpfle, G., Bosshard, C., Schlesser, R., and Guinter, P., IEEE J. Quantum. Electron. 30 (5), 1303–12 (1994)Google Scholar
3. Schlesser, R., Dietrich, T., Sitar, Z., Gitmans, F., Kuindig, A., Eng, L., Muinch, B., and Guinter, P., J. Appl. Phys. 78 (8), 4943–7 (1995)Google Scholar
4. Allen, F.A., Bellard, S., Brice, M.D., Cartwright, B.A., Doubleday, A., Higgs, H., Hummelink, T., Hummelink, B.G., Kennard, O., Motherwell, W.D.S., Rodgers, J.R., and Watson, D.G., Acta Cryst. B 35, 2331–9 (1979)Google Scholar
5. Moritani, Y. and Kashino, S., Acta Cryst. C 47, 461–3 (1991)Google Scholar
6. Gotoh, T., Fukuda, S., and Yamashiki, T., in Fifth Toyota Conference: Nonlinear Optical Materials, Aichi-ken, Japan, 1992, pp. 261–6Google Scholar
7. Burrows, P.E., Zhang, Y., Haskal, E.I., and Forrest, S.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 (20), 2417–9 (1992)Google Scholar
8. Kern, W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 (6), 1887–92 (1990)Google Scholar