Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:52:58.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moisture Intrusion in Sio2/Epoxy Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Ken M. Takahashi*
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
Get access

Abstract

Summary

In-situ interfacial impedance measurements were used to study the effects of moisture at 80 °C on the interface between oxidized silicon and a diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) epoxy cured with diethylene triamine (DETA). Using two electrode configurations, admittances attributable to bulk and interfacial conduction processes were distinguished. Bulk impedance measurements followed Randles behavior; conduction in the bulk epoxy was ionic, and was diffusion controlled at low frequencies. Equivalent circuit models were used to demonstrate that an apparent interfacial conduction process was caused by distributed current leakage into the silicon subphase, not a true interfacial conduction path that would indicate water adsorption or interfacial aggregation. However, transitions in diffusivity and bulk epoxy permittivity behavior above a 70-80% relative humidity threshold were observed. Effective epoxy permittivity (∈c) jumped to values indicative of a water cluster induced Maxwell-Wagner relaxation. The humidity threshold corresponds to a level that has been associated with adhesion loss in epoxies. It appears that epoxy adhesion losses result from bulk epoxy property changes at high humidity rather than interfacial bond displacement or delamination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Takahashi, K. M., to be published Google Scholar
2. Sluyters-Rehbach, M., and Sluyters, J. H., in “Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry”, Yeager, E. et. al., eds., 9, Plenum Press, NY 1984.Google Scholar
3. Fox, P., ed., “PORT Mathematical Subroutine Library”, AT&T Bell Laboratories, 1984.Google Scholar
4. Takahashi, K. M., and Sullivan, T. M., to be published Google Scholar
5. Yang, H. W. and Tyler, A. L., Ind. Eng. Chem., Prod. Res. Dcv., 16, 252 (1977).Google Scholar
6. Butler, J. A. V., “Electrocapillarity”, Chemical Publishing Co., Inc., NY 1940.Google Scholar
7. Sargent, J. P. and Ashbee, K. H. G., J. Adhesion, 17, 83 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Gledhill, R. A., Kinloch, A. J., and Shaw, S. J., J. Adhesion, 11, 3 (1980).Google Scholar