Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:57:19.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modelling of the Degradation of Cement in a Nuclear Waste Repository

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Get access

Abstract

The current UK concept for a low- or intermediate-level nuclear waste repository includes a largely cementitious backfill. The cement provides a high pH environment in which the general corrosion rate of the metal canisters is reduced and the solubilities of many nuclides low. It has previously been assumed that this high pH will exist for a period of 107 years, however cement will degrade due to leaching of the solid components and attack from aqueous species in groundwater. In this paper we describe the preliminary stages of a model of the degradation of cement in a repository. The modelling involves the incorporation of a thermodynamic description of cement[2] into the static code PHREEQE[5]. This is then used in a coupled chemistry-transport model of simple leaching of cement using the code CHEQMATE[4]. This preliminary modelling also provides a useful verification of CHEQMATE as a direct comparison with a THCCDM (a coupled code based on CHEMTRN) model is possible. Results from this preliminary model suggest that the fall in pH due to leaching is slow. The model is sufficiently flexible to form the basis of more detailed investigations of the effect of groundwater interactions on the degradation of cement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Atkinson, A., ‘The Time-Dependence of the pH within a Repository for Radioactive Waste Disposal’, AERE-Report, AERE-R 11777 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Berner, U., ‘Modelling the Incongruent Dissolution of Hydrated Cement Minerals’, Radiochimica Acta, Proc. Int. Conf. ‘Migration 87’.Google Scholar
3. Sharland, S.M., ‘The Evolution of the pH in the Cementitous Components of a Model Nuclear Waste Repository’, TP Report TP 1160 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Haworth, A., Sharland, S.M., Tasker, P.W. and Tweed, C.J., ‘A Guide to the Coupled Chemical Equilibria and Migration Code CHEQMATE’, NSS Report NSS-R113 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Parkhurst, D.L., Thorstenson, D. C., and Plummer, L.N., Geological Survey, U.S., Water-Resources Investigations, 80–96 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Haworth, A., Sharland, S.M., Tasker, P.W. and Tweed, C.J., ‘Evolution of the Groundwater Chemistry Around a Nuclear Waste Repository’, presented at the Symposium for the Scientific Basis fo Nuclear Waste Management at the MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Berner, U., Jacobsen, J., McKinley, I.G., ‘The Near-Field Chemistry of a Swiss L-ILW Repository’, presented at NEA/NAGRA workshop on near-field assessment of repositories for low- and medium-level waste, 23–25th November 1987.Google Scholar