Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:45:28.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modeling the Effect of Irradiation and Post-Irradiation Annealing on Grain Boundary Composition in Austenitic Fe-Cr-Ni Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T.R. Allen ,
J.T. Busby ,
E. A. Kenik  and
G.S. Was
T.R. Allen
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory-West PO Box 2528, Idaho Falls, ID 83403-2528
J.T. Busby
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological SciencesUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
E. A. Kenik
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
G.S. Was
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological SciencesUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Get access

Abstract

Many irradiation effects in Fe-Cr-Ni alloys such as radiation-induced segregation, radiation-enhanced diffusion, and void swelling are known to vary with bulk alloy composition. The development of microstructural and microchemical changes during irradiation and during post-irradiation annealing is determined by the rate of diffusion of point defects and alloying elements. To accurately predict the changes in grain boundary chemistry due to radiation-induced segregation and post-irradiation annealing, the composition dependence of diffusion parameters, such as the migration energy, must be known. A model has been developed which calculates migration energies using pair interaction energies, thereby accounting for the effect of composition on diffusivity. The advantages of this calculational method are that a single set of input parameters can be used for a wide range of bulk alloy compositions, and the effects of local order can easily be incorporated into the calculations. A description of the model is presented, and model calculations are compared to segregation measurements from seven different iron-chromium-nickel alloys, irradiated with protons to doses from 0.1 to 3.0 dpa at temperatures between 200°C and 600°C. Results show that segregation trends can be modeled using a single set of input parameters with the difference between model calculation and measurement being less than 5 at%, but usually less than 2 at%. Additionally, model predictions are compared to grain boundary composition measurements of neutron irradiated 304 stainless steel following annealing. For the limited annealing data available, model calculations correctly predict the magnitude and time scale for recovery of the grain boundary composition.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 527: Symposium Z – Diffusion Mechanisms in Crystalline Materials , 1998 , 291
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Andresen, P.L., Ford, F.P., Murphy, S.M., and Perks, J.M., Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems–Water Reactors, Jekyll Island, GA, August 1989 (NACE, Houston, 1990), 1.Google Scholar
[2] Allen, T. R., Busby, J. T., Was, G. S., and Kenik, E. A., accepted by J. Nucl. Mater.Google Scholar
[3] Simonen, E. P., Chariot, L. A., and Bruemmer, S. M., J. Nucl. Mater. 225 (1995) 117.Google Scholar
[4] Damcott, D. L., Allen, T. R., and Was, G. S., J. Nucl. Mater., 225 (1995) 97.Google Scholar
[5] Allen, T. R., Was, G. S., accepted by Effects of Radiation on Materials: 18th International Symposium. ASTM STP 1325, Nanstad, R. K. Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1997.Google Scholar
[6] Allen, T. R. and Was, G. S., accepted by Acta Met.Google Scholar
[7] Perks, J.M., Marwick, A.D., and English, C.A., AERE R 12121 June 1986.Google Scholar
[8] Lam, N. Q., Kumar, A., and Wiedersich, H., Effects of Radiation on Materials: Eleventh conference, ASTM STP 782, Brager, H. R. and Perrin, J. S., Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1982, 985.Google Scholar
[9] Atomic Defects in Metals, ed Ullmain, H., Landolt-Bornstein, New Series, Group 3, Vol 25 (Springer-Verlag, City, 1991).Google Scholar
[10] Rothman, S.J., Nowicki, L.J., and Murch, G.E., Journal of Physics F:Metal Physics 10 (1980) 383.Google Scholar
[11] Kittel, C., Introduction to Solid State Physics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1986.Google Scholar
[12] Allen, T. R., Was, G. S., and Kenik, E. A., Proc. Seventh Int. Symp. on Env. Deg. of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, Gold, R.E and Simonen, E.P (Ed.), Breckenridge, CO (1995), 997.Google Scholar
[13] Kaufman, L. and Nesor, H., CALPHAD, 4 (1978) 295.Google Scholar
[14] Fontaine, D. de, in Solid state Physics: Advances in research and Applications, Eds., Enrenreich, H. and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994), Vol 47, 33.Google Scholar
[15] Kohler, F., Montash. Chemie 91 (1960) 738.Google Scholar
[16] Million, B., Ruzickova, J., and Vrestal, J., Materials Science and Engineering 72 (1985) 85.Google Scholar
[17] Ruzickova, J. and Million, B., Materials Science and Engineering 50(1981) 59.Google Scholar
[18] Simonen, E. P. and Bruemmer, S. M., Proceedings of the MRS Fall Meeting Symposium Y: Microstructure of Irradiated Materials, Eds., Robertson, I. M., Rehn, L. E., Zinkle, S. J., Phythian, W. J., Vol 373, 1995, 95.Google Scholar
[19] Jacobs, A. J. and Dumbill, S., Proc. Seventh Int. Symp. on Env. Deg. of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, Gold, R.E and Simonen, E.P (Ed.), Breckenridge, CO (1995), 1021.Google Scholar