Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:11:24.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling and Characterization of Silicon Nanowire Networks for Thermoelectric Conversion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2012

Kate J. Norris
Affiliation:
Baskin School of Engineering, Univ. of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States. Nanostructured Energy Conversion Technology and Research, Advanced Studies Laboratories, Univ. of California Santa Cruz – NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States.
Andrew J. Lohn
Affiliation:
Baskin School of Engineering, Univ. of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States. Nanostructured Energy Conversion Technology and Research, Advanced Studies Laboratories, Univ. of California Santa Cruz – NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States.
Elane Coleman
Affiliation:
Structured Materials Industries, Inc., Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Gary S. Tompa
Affiliation:
Structured Materials Industries, Inc., Piscataway, NJ, United States.
Nobuhiko P. Kobayashi
Affiliation:
Baskin School of Engineering, Univ. of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States. Nanostructured Energy Conversion Technology and Research, Advanced Studies Laboratories, Univ. of California Santa Cruz – NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States.
Get access

Abstract

We report the growth of silicon nanowires by plasma assisted metal organic chemical vapor deposition. Silicon nanowires grew as three-dimensional networks in which electrical charges and heat can travel over the distance much longer than the mean length of the constituent nanowires. We studied the dependence of thermoelectric properties on two factors; nominal doping concentrations and geometrical factors within the silicon nanowire networks. The silicon nanowire networks show Seebeck coefficients comparable with that of bulk silicon for a given nominal doping concentration, allowing us to control Seebeck coefficients by tuning the doping concentrations. Rather than studying single nanowires, we chose networks of nanowires formed densely across large areas required for large scale production. We also studied the role played by intersections where multiple nanowires were fused to form the nanowire networks. Structural analysis, transport measurement, and modeling based on finite-element analysis were carried out to obtain insights of physical properties at the intersections. Understanding these physical properties of three-dimensional nanowire networks will advance the development of thermoelectric devices.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Husband, W.W. and Beyene, A., Int. J. Energy Res. 32, 1373 (2008).10.1002/er.1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Jing-Feng, et al. ., NPG Asia Materials 2, 152 (2010).10.1038/asiamat.2010.138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, T.C., et al. ., Mater. 34, L19 (2005).Google Scholar
Walachová, J., Zeipl, R., Zelinka, J. and Malina, V.. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87.8, 081902 (2005).10.1063/1.2001755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohn, A.J., Coleman, E., Tompa, G.S., Kobayashi, N.P., Phys. Status Solid A 209, 171 (2012).10.1002/pssa.201127388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatasubramanian, R., Siivola, E., Colpitts, T., and O’Quinn, B., Nature 413, 597 (2001).10.1038/35098012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vineis, C.J., et al. ., Advanced Materials 22.36 3970 (2010).10.1002/adma.201000839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Hong, et al. ., Adv. Mater. 23, 2377 (2011).10.1002/adma.201100449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, L.D., Dresselhaus, M.S., Phys. Rev. B 47, 12727 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.12727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, H. et al. ., Nat. Mater. 6, 129 (2007).10.1038/nmat1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Deyu, et al. ., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2934 (2003).10.1063/1.1616981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, L.D. and Dresselhaus, M.S., Phys. Rev. B 47, 16631 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.16631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochbaum, A.I., et al. ., Nature 451, 163 (2008).10.1038/nature06381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Lihong, et al. ., Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 063102 (2009).10.1063/1.3204005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druzhinin, Anatoly, et al. ., Phys. Status Solidi C 8, No. 3, 867 (2011).10.1002/pssc.200900266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boukai, A.I. et al. ., Nature 451, 168 (2008).10.1038/nature06458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsakalaskos, L., et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 233117 (2007).10.1063/1.2821113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, et al. ., J. Appl. Phys., 93, 15 (2003)10.1063/1.1524305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, T., Yamada, H., Lohn, A.J., and Kobayashi, N.P., Proc.. of SPIE 8106, 810601 (2011).Google Scholar
Majkova, E., et al. ., Phys. Status Solid B 153, K147 (1989).10.1002/pssb.2221530247CrossRefGoogle Scholar