Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:14:33.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Model for Predicting the Temperature Distribution Around Radioactive Waste Containers in Very Deep Geological Boreholes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Karl P. Travis
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, U. K.
Neil A. McTaggart
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, U. K.
Fergus G. F. Gibb
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, U. K.
David Burley
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, U. K.
Get access

Abstract

We present a mathematical model for determining the temperature field around radioactive waste containers in very deep geological boreholes. The model is first used to predict the temperature rise for some simple, but well-established cases with known solutions in order to verify the numerical work. The temperature distribution is then determined for two variants of the deep bore hole concept; a low temperature variant and a high temperature variant. The results from these studies are discussed in terms of their utility in establishing deep borehole disposal as a workable concept.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chapman, N. and Gibb, F. G. F., Radwaste Solutions, 10, 26 (2003).Google Scholar
2 M. I. T., , The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, (2003).Google Scholar
3 Harrison, T., Very deep borehole: Deutag's opinion on boring, container emplacement and retrievability, SKB Report R-00-35, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, Sweden (2000).Google Scholar
4 NIREX Technical Note, Cost Estimate For A Reference Repository Concept For UK HLW/SNF, No. 484281, (2005).Google Scholar
5 Marsic, N., Grundfelt, B., Wiborgh, M. and Konsult, K. AB, Very deep hole concept: thermal effects on groundwater flow, SKB Report R-06-59, (2006).Google Scholar
6 Gibb, F. G. F. and Attrill, P. G., Geology, 31, 657 (2003).Google Scholar
7 Gibb, F. G. F., Travis, K. P., McTaggart, N. A., Burley, D., Nuclear Technology, in press (2007).Google Scholar
8 Attrill, P. G. and Gibb, F. G. F., Lithos, 67, 103 (2003).Google Scholar
9 Attrill, P. G. and Gibb, F. G. F., Lithos, 67, 119 (2003).Google Scholar
10 Carslaw, H. S. and Jaeger, J. C. Conduction of heat in solids, (Clarendon press, Oxford. 1959), pp 510.Google Scholar
11 Hodgkinson, D. P., Deep rock disposal of high-level radioactive waste: transient heat conduction from dispersed blocks, Report R8783, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell, UK, (1977).Google Scholar
12 Burstall, R. F., FISPIN: A Computer code for Nuclide Inventory Calculations, ND-R-328(R) (1979).Google Scholar