Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:28:59.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mineralogy of the Residues from an Underground Coal Gasification Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Gregory J. McCarthy ,
Robert J. Stevenson  and
Robert L. Oliver
Gregory J. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Departments of Chemistry and Geology, North Dakota State University, Fargo ND 58105
Robert J. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Energy and Mineral Research Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202
Robert L. Oliver
Affiliation:
Western Research Institute, P.O. Box 3395, Laramie, Wyoming 82071
Get access

Abstract

Detailed mineralogical characterization by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and electron microprobe analysis has been performed on a suite of residues and on three samples of unaltered overburden excavated from a 1983 underground coal gasification (UCG) test conducted at a mine site near Centralia, Washington. The residues were classified into nine zones based on their appearance and location in the burn cavity. Because they were isochemical with the overburden, six of these zones could be identified as altered overburden and proved to be particularly useful for correlations of mineralogy with the temperature and redox atmosphere prevailing in these materials during the UCG process. A previously unrecognized, moderate temperature, reaction between reduced iron phases and clay minerals to form an Al-rich hercynite-spinel solid solution (Al-spinel), (Fe,Mg)Al2O4, was identified. This reaction is a precursor to the well-known formation of Fe-cordierite, (Mg,Fe)2 Al4Si5O18 from SiO2 and the Al-spinel at higher temperatures. The mineralogies of altered overburden were analogous to high-temperature, low pressure, metamorphic rocks of the sanidinite facies, and to thermally altered rocks from natural coal combustion. Modeling of the mineral phase assemblages was successfully performed using a phase diagram for the system (FeO+MgO)-Al2O3-SiO2 constructed from literature diagrams. Melting relations were also modeled with this diagram. Deviations from the assemblages predicted by this diagram were attributed to oxidizing conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 136: Symposium O – Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products V , 1988 , 113
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dana, G.F., Oliver, R.L. and Covell, J.R., in Proc. 11th UCG Symp., August, 1985.Google Scholar
2. Oliver, R.L., in Proc. 13th UCG Svmo., Laramie WY, August, 1987.Google Scholar
3. Krahnel, R.A. and Scarlett, B., in Proc. 13th UCG Svmo., August, 1987.Google Scholar
4. Oliver, R.L., Spackman, L.K. and Mason, G.M., G.M., in Proc. 13 UCG Symp., Laramie WY, August, 1987. See also: R.L. Oliver and G.J. Mason, Laboratory Analysis of Samples from the Tono I UCG Cavity – Materials Characterization and Environmental Implications, Gas Research Institute Report GRI-88/0171 (1988).Google Scholar
5. McCarthy, G.J., Powder Diffraction 1, 50 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Stevenson, R.J. and Larsen, A.L., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal I, edited by McCarthy, G.J. and Lauf, R.J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol.43, (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1985) pp. 177–186.Google Scholar
7. Stevenson, R.J. and McCarthy, G.J., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization, Utilization and Disposal II, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P. and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol.65, (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986) pp. 77–90.Google Scholar
8. McClune, W.F., Editor-in-Chief, Powder Diffraction File, JCPDS-International Centre for Diffraction Data, Swarthmore, PA (1988).Google Scholar
9. Jackson, K.C., Clinker Genesis and the Comparison of Naturally Occurrine Clinker to Compounds in the System FeO-Al2O3SiO2 , B.S. Thesis, Beloit College, Beloit Illinois, 42 pp. (1982).Google Scholar
10. Turner, F.W., Metamorphic Petroloev. Mineraloeical and Field AsPects, McGraw- Hill Book Co., New York, 1968).Google Scholar
11. Reverdatto, V.V., in The Facies of Contact Metamorphism, Neda Press, Moscow, 1970 (translated from Russian by D.A. Brown, Australian National University, Canberra, Dept. Geol. Publ. 223, 1973).Google Scholar
12. Burns, L.K., Craig, G.N., Ethridge, F.G., Youngberg, A.D., in Proc. 7th UCG Symp., August, 1981.Google Scholar
13. Oliver, R.L. and Youngberg, A.D., , A.D., Preburn versus Postburn Mineraloev and Geochemical Characteristics of Overburden and Coal at the Hanna UCG Site, DOE Rept DOE/ET/10723-1545, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Marcouiller, B.A., Burns, L.K. and Ethridge, F.G., Overburden Characterization and Post-Burn Study of the Hanna IV UCG Site and Comparison to Other Wvoming UCG Sites, Report of Contract No. AS20-83LC11010, Colorado State University, November, 1984.Google Scholar
15. Burns, L.K., Craig, G.N., Alexander, W.G., Ethridge, F.G., Laughter, T. and Youngberg, A.D., in Proc. 8th UCG Svmn., August, 1982.Google Scholar
16. Bastin, E.S., J. Geol. 13, 408 (1905).Google Scholar
17. Vankatesh, V., V., Am. Mineralog. 37, 831 (1952).Google Scholar
18. Daly, D.J., Natural Coal-Combustion Pvrometamorphism: A Review of the Literature, Rept. to the Gas Research Institute, University of North Dakota; D.J. Daly, R.J. Stevenson and C.R. Schmit, in Proc. 14th UCG Symp., August 1988 (in press).Google Scholar
19. Deer, W.A., Howie, R.A. and Zussman, J., Rock Forming Minerals, Vol.1 Ortho- and Ring Silicates; Vol.5 Non-Silicates, (1983).Google Scholar
20. Bailey, D.K. and MacDonald, R., The Evolution of the Crystalline Rocks, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1976).Google Scholar
21. Eskola, P., “Die metamorphen Gesteine” in Die Enstehung der Gesteine, Barth, T.F.W., Correns, C.W. and Eskola, P., pp. 263–407 (1939)Google Scholar
22. Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, Publ. by the American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, Volume 1 (1964).Google Scholar