Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:47:35.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mimicking the Real World and Exploring New Ones with In-Situ Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. Howie*
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHE, UK, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Recent progress with in-situ observations by electron microscopy is briefly surveyed by referring to developments in instrumentation for reflection and low energy electron imaging as well as for high resolution transmission imaging and spectroscopy. New opportunities have been opened up by environmental microscopy. With increased levels of illumination intensity, the ever present question of beam-induced effects is of mounting concern particularly in studies of non-metallic materials.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hirsch, P. B., Horne, R. W. and Whelan, M. J., Phil. Mag. 1, 677 (1956).Google Scholar
2. Silcox, J. and Whelan, M. J., Phil. Mag. 5, 1 (1960).Google Scholar
3. Butler, E. P. and Hale, K. F., Dynamic Experiments in the Electron Microscope, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1981.Google Scholar
4. Clarke, D. R. and Chiao, Y-H., Ultramicroscopy 29, 203 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Hashimoto, H., Ultramicroscopy 18, 19 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Goulden, D. A., Phil. Mag. 33, 393 (1976).Google Scholar
7. Poppa, H. R., Ultramicroscopy 11, 105 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Hembree, G. G., Crozier, P. A., Drucker, J. S.. Krishnamurthy, M., Venables, J. A. and Cowley, J. M., Ultramicroscopy 31, 111 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Ross, F. M. and Gibson, J. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1782 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Yagi, K., Surf. Sci. Rep. 17, 305 (1993)Google Scholar
11. Telieps, W. and Bauer, E., Surf. Sci. 162, 163 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Hamers, R. J., Kohler, U. K. and Demuth, J. E., Ultramicroscopy 31, 10 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Danilatos, G., Foundations of Environmental Microscopy. in Adv. in Electronics and Electron Physics 71 (1988) 109250.Google Scholar
14. Kinoshita, C., Tomokiyo, Y. and Nakai, K., Ultramicroscopy 56, 216 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Allen, C. W., Ultramicroscopy 56, 200 (1994).Google Scholar
16. Mayer, R. M., Brown, L. M. and Gosele, U., J. Nucl. Mater. 95, 44 (1980).Google Scholar
17. Brown, L. M., Fathy, D. and Valdre, U. in Electron Microscopy and Analysis 1979, edited by Mulvey, T. (Inst. of Physics Conf. Ser. 52, Bristol, UK 1979) p. 137140.Google Scholar
18. Smith, D. J., Ultramicroscopy 29, 1 (1989).Google Scholar
19. Smith, D. J., Glaisher, R. W., Lu, P. and McCartney, M. R., Ultramicroscopy 29, 123 (1989).Google Scholar
20 Iijima, S. and Ichihashi, T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 616 (1986).Google Scholar
21. Bovin, J. O., Wallenberg, R. and Smith, D. J., Nature 317, 47 (1985).Google Scholar
22. Sinclair, R. and Konno, T. J., Ultramicroscopy 56, 225 (1994).Google Scholar
23. Walsh, C. A., Phil. Mag. A59, 227 (1989).Google Scholar
24. Marikar, P., Brodsky, M. B., Sowers, C. H. and Zalujec, N. J., Ultramicroscopy 29, 247 (1989).Google Scholar
25. Milne, R. H. and Howie, A., Phil. Mag. A49, 665 (1984).Google Scholar
26. Peng, L. M., Surf. Sci. 316, L1049 (1994).Google Scholar
27. Osakabe, N., Yagi, K. and Honjo, G., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 19, L.309 (1980).Google Scholar
28. Osakabe, N., Tanishiro, Y., Yagi, K. and Honjo, G., Surf. Sci. 109, 353 (1981).Google Scholar
29. Tanishiro, Y. and Takayanagi, K., Ultramicroscopy 31, 20 (1989).Google Scholar
30. Shimizu, N., Tanishiro, Y., Takayanagi, K. and Yagi, K., Surf. Sci. 191, 28 (1987).Google Scholar
31. Harris, J. J., Joyce, B. A. and Dobson, P.J., Surf. Sci. 108, L90 (1981).Google Scholar
32. Yagi, K., Minoda, H. and Shima, M., Thin Solid Films 228. 12 (1993).Google Scholar
33. Homma, Y., Osaka, J. and Inoue, N., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, L563 (1994).Google Scholar
34. Bauer, E. and Telieps, W., in Surface and Interface Characterisation by Electron Optical Methods, edited by Howie, A. and Valdre, U. (Plenum Press., New York, 1988) p. 195.Google Scholar
35. Bauer, E., Mundschau, M., Sweich, W. and Telieps, W., Ultramicroscopy 31, 49 (1989).Google Scholar
36. von Oertzen, A., Rotermund, H. H., Jakubith, S. and Ertl, G., Ultramicroscopy 36, 107 (1991).Google Scholar
37. Rotermund, H. H., Ertl, G. and Sesselmann, W., Surf. Sci. 217, L383 (1989).Google Scholar
38. Rotermund, H. H., Surf. Sci., 283, 87 (1993).Google Scholar
39. Danilatos, G., J. Microscopy 162, 391 (1991).Google Scholar
40. Danilatos, G., Theory of the Design of the Gaseous Detector in the ESEM, Adv. in Electronics and Electron Physics 78 (1990), p. 1102.Google Scholar
41. Meredith, P., Donald, A. M. and Luke, K., J. Mat. Sci. 30, 1921 (1995).Google Scholar
42. Meredith, P. and Donald, A. M., Microscopy, J., 180, (1995) (in press).Google Scholar
43. Howie, A., J. Microscopy 180 (1995) (in press).Google Scholar
44. Howie, A., Rocca, F. J. and Valdre, U., Phil. Mag. B52, 751 (1985).Google Scholar
45. Howie, A., Mohid, M. N. Muhd, Rocca, F. J. and Valdre, U. in Electron Microscopy and Analysis 1987, edited by Brown, L.M. (Inst. of Phys Conf. Ser. 90, Bristol, 1987), p. 155158.Google Scholar
46. Fryer, J.R. and Holland, F., Proc. Roy. Soc., A293, 353 (1984).Google Scholar
47. Cochrane, H.D. and Hutchison, J.L., Ultramicroscopy 31, 138 (1989).Google Scholar
48. Medlin, D.L., Thomas, L.E. and Howitt, D.G., Ultramicroscopy 29, 228 (1989).Google Scholar
49. Bonevich, J.E. and Marks, L.D., Ultramicroscopy 35, 161 (1991).Google Scholar
50. Malm, J.-O., Ultramicroscopy 31, 143 (1989).Google Scholar
51 Knotek, M.L. and Feibelman, P.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 964 (1978).Google Scholar
52. Miura, K., Sugiura, K. and Sugiura, H, Surf. Sci. Lett. 253, L407 (1991).Google Scholar
53. Howie, A., Nature 320, 684 (1986).Google Scholar
54. Ajayan, P.M. and Marks, L.D., Phase Transit. (UK) B24–26, 229 (1990)..Google Scholar
55. Broers, A.N., Proc. Roy. Soc. A416, 1 (1988).Google Scholar
56. Muray, A., Isaacson, M., and Adesida, I, Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, 589 (1984).Google Scholar
57. Salisbury, I.G., Timsit, R.S., Berger, S.D. and Humphreys, C.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, pp 12 and 1289 (1984).Google Scholar
58. Berger, S.D., Salisbury, I.G., Milne, R.H., Imeson, D. and Humphreys, C.J., Phil. Mag. B55, 341 (1987).Google Scholar
59. Allen, R.M., PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
60. Murooka, Y., Rodenburg, J.M. and Walls, M.G., Proc. Roy. Microsc. Soc. 25, 185 (1990).Google Scholar
61. Berger, S.D., Macaulay, J.M., Brown, L.M. and Allen, R.M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 129 Pittsburg, PA 1989) p. 515520 Google Scholar
62. Zanetti, R., Bleloch, A.L., Grimshaw, M.P. and Jones, G.A.C., Phil. Mag. Letts. 69, 285 (1994).Google Scholar
63. Maeda, K., Sato, M., Kubo, A. and Takeuchi, S., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 161 (1982).Google Scholar
64. Lu, G. and Cockayne, D.J.H., Phil. Mag. A53, 297 (1986).Google Scholar
65. Burden, A.P. and Hutchison, J.L., J. Crystal Growth (1995) (in press).Google Scholar
66. Stoltze, P. and Norskov, J. K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2502 (1985).Google Scholar
67. Gai, P.L., J. Solid State Chem. 104, 119 (1993).Google Scholar
68. Gai, P.L. and Kourtakis, K., Science 267, p. 661 (1995).Google Scholar
69. Thomas, J.M., Greaves, G.N. and Catlow, C.R.A., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B97, p. 1 (1995).Google Scholar
70. Rotermund, H.H., Haas, G., Franz, R.U., Tromp, R.M. and Ertl, G., Science 270, p. 608 (1995).Google Scholar
71. McVitie, S., Chapman, J.N., Zhou, L., Heyderman, L.J. and Nicholson, W.A.P., J. Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 148, 232 (1995).Google Scholar
72. Gillies, M.F., Chapman, J.N. and Kools, J.C.S., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
73. Eigler, D.M. and Schweizer, E.K., Nature 344, 524 (1990).Google Scholar
74. Ebert, Ph., Lagally, M.C. and Urban, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1437 (1993).Google Scholar