Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:22:34.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructure, Phase Stability, Mechanical Properties, and Shape Memory Characteristics of Ni-Fe-AI-B Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

E. P. George ,
C. T. Liu ,
C. J. Sparks ,
Ming-Yuan Kao ,
J. A. Horton ,
Henry Kunsmann  and
Todd King
E. P. George
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6093
C. T. Liu
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6093
C. J. Sparks
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6093
Ming-Yuan Kao
Affiliation:
Johnson Controls, Inc., 5757 N. Green Bay Ave., Mail Stop G3, Milwaukee, WI 53201
J. A. Horton
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6093
Henry Kunsmann
Affiliation:
Eaton Corporation, 4201 North 27th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53216
Todd King
Affiliation:
Eaton Corporation, 4201 North 27th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53216
Get access

Abstract

Conventionally cast and hot-rolled Ni-Fe-AI-B alloys containing 4-20 at.% Fe, 23.9- 31.5 at.% Al, and 300 wppm B were investigated in this study. After oil quenching from 1300°C, all the alloys—except SMA-15 (27A1-14Fe)—have at least a two-phase microstructure, one phase of which is martensite with the characteristic plate morphology, and the other a globular second phase distributed throughout the microstructure. The amount of second phase generally increases with increasing Fe content. Alloys containing less than 14% Fe were found to be quite brittle at room temperature, indicating that a ductile second phase is at least partly responsible for the improved room-temperature ductility in the high-Fe alloys. The best tensile ductility (12%) was obtained in SMA-17 (23.9AI-20Fe) which was shown by X-ray diffraction to consist of 40% (mostly disordered) fcc [(Ni,Fe)3 (AI,Fe)] + 30% (partly ordered) bct martensite + 30% B2. Differential scanning calorimetry showed that the transformation temperatures for this alloy were MP = 65°C and AP = 95°C. Room-temperature tensile strains of 2-3% could be almost completely recovered in SMA-17 by heating for 3 min. at 600°C with the load removed. Upon subsequent cycling (i.e., strain-anneal cycling), the amount of strain recovery increased dramatically from 70% in the first cycle to nearly 100% after 4-5 cycles, indicating that cold work may help in improving the shape memory characteristics of this alloy. SMA-15 was found to have significantly higher transformation temperatures (Mp = 143°C and Ap = 170°C) than SMA-17; however, it is relatively brittle compared to SMA-17.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 246: Symposium M – Shape-Memory Materials and Phenomena--Fundamental Aspects and Applications , 1991 , 121
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ishida, K., Kainuma, R., Ueno, N., and Nishizawa, T., Metall. Trans. A 22A, 441 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Kim, Y. D. and Wayman, C. M., Scr. Metall. 25, 1863–68 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Tanner, L. E., Schryvers, D., and Shapiro, S. M., Mater. Sci. Eng. A127, 205–213 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chakravorty, S. and Wayman, C. M., Metall. Trans. A 7A, 555 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chakravorty, S. and Wayman, C. M., Metall. Trans. A 7A, 569 (1976).Google Scholar
6. Moskovic, R., J. Mater. Sci. 12, 489 (1977).Google Scholar
7. Litvinov, V. S. and Arkhangelrs, A. a. Kaya, Fiz. Met. Metall. 44 (4), 826 (1977).Google Scholar
8. Georgopoulos, P. and Cohen, J. B., Scripta Met. 11, 147 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. George, E. P. and Liu, C. T., J. Mater. Res. 5, 754 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Hahn, K. H. and Vedula, K., Scr. Metall. 23, 7 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Russell, Scott M., Law, C. C., and Blackburn, M. J., p. 627 in MRS Proc. High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys, Vol. 133, MRS Publication, 1989.Google Scholar
12. Guha, Sumit, Munroe, Paul R., and Baker, Ian, p. 633 in MRS Proc. High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys, Vol. 133, MRS Publication, 1989.Google Scholar
13. Miracle, D. B., Russell, S., and Law, C. C., p. 225 in MRS Proc. High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys, Vol. 133, MRS Publication, 1989.Google Scholar
14. Ochiai, S., Oya, Y., and Suzuki, T., Acta Metall. 32, 289–298 (1984).Google Scholar
15. Furukawa, S., Inoue, A., and Masumoto, T., Mater. Sci. Eng. 98, 515–518 (1988).Google Scholar
16. Wallin, M., Johansson, P. and Savage, S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A133, 307–311 (1991).Google Scholar
17. Wallin, M., “Characterization and Properties of New Shape Memory Alloys in the Ni-Fe-Al System,” Report No. IM-2598, Swedish Institute for Metals Research, Stockholm, Sweden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Liu, C. T., Sparks, C. J., Horton, J. A., George, E. P., Carmichael, C. A., Kao, Ming-Yuan and Kunsmann, Henry, to be published in these proceedings, 1992.Google Scholar