Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:20:11.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Microstructure of Cement Aggregate Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

X. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Science of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OXI 3PH, UK.
G. W. Groves
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Science of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OXI 3PH, UK.
S. A. Rodger
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Science of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OXI 3PH, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Mortar bars of tricalcium silicate or ordinary portland cement with small aggregate particles have been sectioned and examined in the transmission electron microscope (TEM). The presence of calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) gel at the interface is seen by TEM in many cases in intimate contact with the aggregate. In some cases calcium hydroxide (CH) is observed near the interface but is seldom in contact with the aggregate. Microanalysis in the TEM shows that in the case of reactive silica aggregate a gel of relatively low Ca:Si ratio is found at the interface. Aggregates of different degrees of reactivity and mortars of different ages are compared. It is suggested that interface fractures may occur beyond the coating of CSH rather than at the true interface in the case of the type of particles we have studied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Maso, J.C., 7th Int. Cong. Chem. Cem., 1, VII1/3 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Strubble, L., Skalny, J. and Mindess, S., Cem. Conc. Res., 10 (2), 277 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Farran, J., Javelas, R., Maso, J.C. and Perrin, B., Comptes Rendus, 275, 1467 (1972).Google Scholar
4. Barnes, B.D., Diamond, S. and Dolch, W.L., Cem. Conc. Res., 8(2), 233 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Diamond, S., 8th Int. Cong. Chem. Cem., 1, 122 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Monteiro, P.J.M., Maso, J.C. and Ollivier, J. P, Cem. Conc. Res., 15, 953 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Langton, C.A. and Roy, D.M., 7th Int. Cong. Chem. Cem., III, VII-127 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Javelas, R., Maso, J.C., Ollivier, J.P. and Theroz, B., Cem. Conc. Res., 5, 285 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Struble, L. and Mindess, S., Int. J. Cem. Comp. and Ltwt Conc., 5, 79 (1983)Google Scholar
10. Turriziani, R., 8th Int. Cong. Chem. Cem., 1, 388 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Struble, L. and Diamond, S., “Alkalis in ConcreteASTM Special Technical Publication 930, 3145 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Gutteridge, W.A. and Hobbs, D.W., Cem Conc. Res., 10, 183 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar