Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:02:28.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructure Evolution During Solid-State Reactions in Polycrystalline Nb/Al and Ti/Ai Multilayer Thin-Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

G. Lucadamo ,
K. Barmak ,
D. T. Carpenter ,
C. Lavoie ,
C. Cabral Jr ,
C. Michaelsen  and
J. M. Rickman
G. Lucadamo
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Eng., Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
K. Barmak
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Eng., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
D. T. Carpenter
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Eng., Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
C. Lavoie
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
C. Cabral Jr
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
C. Michaelsen
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, GKSS Research Center, D-21502 Geesthacht, Germany
J. M. Rickman
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Eng., Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Get access

Abstract

The microstructural changes that occur during the reaction of sputter-deposited Nb/Al and Ti/Al multilayer thin-films with bilayer thicknesses ranging from 10 nm to 333 nm have been studied. The films were deposited with an overall stoichiometry of XAl3 (X = Nb,Ti) and subsequently annealed to different stages of the reaction in a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Data obtained from cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (XTEM), and in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments have provided evidence for a two-stage reaction mechanism for the formation of NbAl3. Microscopy results from a film with a bilayer period of 333 nm showed a microstructure that was consistent with two-dimensional growth in the plane of the interface. A uniform, 10 nm thick continuous layer of the product phase was formed followed by growth normal to the interface that initially consisted of larger, faceted grains. By the end of the reaction, an equiaxed NbAl3 grain structure was observed. High resolution elemental mapping using a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) revealed penetration of Nb into the Al layer and enhanced growth in regions where Al grain boundaries intersected the interface. Characterization of microstructure evolution in the Ti/Al system was complicated by the formation of two metastable structures consisting of cubic Ll2 followed by tetragonal DO23, and finally the equilibrium, tetragonal DO22 structure. However, the metastable phase transition temperatures were clearly isolated using the in situ XRD technique.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 562: Symposium L – Polycrystalline Metal & Magnetic Thin Films , 1999 , 159
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sullivan, T., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 343, 629 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Baglin, J. E. E., d'Heurle, F. M., and Hammer, W. N., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 266 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Clevenger, L. A., Thompson, C. V., Cammarata, R. C., and Tu, K. N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 795 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Coffey, K. R., Clevenger, L. A., Barmak, K., Rudman, D. A., and Thompson, C. V., J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 852 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Clevenger, L. A., Thompson, C. V., de Avillez, R. R., and Ma, E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8,1566 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Ma, E., Thompson, C. V., and Clevenger, L. A., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 2211 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Michaelsen, C., Wthlert, S., Bormann, R., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 343, 205 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Emeric, E., Bergman, C., Glugnet, G., Gas, P., and Audier, A., Phil. Mag. Lett. 78, 77 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Barmak, K., Michaelsen, C., Vivekanand, S., Ma, F., Phil. Mag. A 77, 167 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Srinivasan, S., Desch, P. B., and Schwartz, R. B., Scripta. Met. 25, 2513 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Michaelsen, C., W~hlert, S., Bormann, R., and Barmak, K., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 398, 245 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Barmak, K., Michaelsen, C., Rickman, J. M., and Dahms, M., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 403, 51 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Lever, R. F., Howard, J. K., Chu, W. K., and Smith, P. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14, 158 (1977).Google Scholar
14. Wittmer, M., LeGoues, F., Huang, H.-C. W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 132, 1450 (1985).Google Scholar
15. Kissinger, H. E., Anal. Chem. 29 1702 (1957).Google Scholar