Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:55:21.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructural Perturbations in Directionally Solidified Al-In, Al-Bi and Zn-Bi Monotectic Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

B. Toloui ,
A. J. Macleod  and
D. D. Double
B. Toloui
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Science of Materials, University of Oxford, England.
A. J. Macleod
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Science of Materials, University of Oxford, England.
D. D. Double
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Science of Materials, University of Oxford, England.
Get access

Abstract

Studies have been made of the microstructures developed in directionally solidified monotectic Al-In, Al-Bi and Zn-Bi alloys, as a function of growth velocity and temperature gradient. With increasing growth velocity and decreasing gradient the microstructures show transitions from regular rod-like arrangements of the lower melting point phase, through arrays of aligned droplets to coarse irregular droplet dispersions. Intermediate stages show rods with longitudinal shape perturbations of a classic Rayleigh-type instability. The changes are discussed in terms of oscillatory instabilities at the solid-liquid interface (enhanced by increasing growth velocity and decreasing temperature gradient) coupled with ripening effects in the solid + liquid region behind the interface.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 12: Symposium L – In Situ Composites IV , 1981 , 253
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Chadwick, G. A., Brit. J. Appl. Phys., 16, 1095, (1965)Google Scholar
2. Cahn, J. W., J. Chem. Phys., 66, 667, (1977)Google Scholar
3. Cahn, J. W., Met. Trans. A, 10A, 119, (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Grugel, R. N. and Hellawell, A., Met. Trans. A, 12A, 669, (1981)Google Scholar
5. Uhlmann, D. R., Chalmers, B. and Jackson, K. A., J. Appl. Phys., 35, 2986, (1964)Google Scholar
6. Chernov, A. A., Temkin, D. E. and Melnikova, A. M., Soν. Phys. Cryst., 21, 369, (1976)Google Scholar
7. Livingstone, J. D. and Cline, H. E., Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 245, 351, (1969)Google Scholar
8. Kamio, A. and Oya, S., Nippon Kinzoku Gazkkai, 33, 60, (1969)Google Scholar
9. Lemkey, F. D., United Technologies U.S. Patent No. 3434827, (1969)Google Scholar
10. Knight, R. J., Li, C.Y. and Spencer, C. W., Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 227, 18,(1963)Google Scholar
11. Johnson, H. and Parr, D., Met. Trans. A, 9A, 1825, (1978)Google Scholar
12. Marich, S. and Jaffery, D., Met. Trans., 2, 2681, (1971)Google Scholar
13. Cline, H. E., Acta Met., 19, 481, (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Jackson, K. A. and Hunt, J. D., Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 236, 1129, (1966)Google Scholar
15. Hunt, J. D., Private Communication, Department of Metallurgy and Science of Materials, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
16. Rayleigh, Lord, Lond. Math. Soc., 10, 4, (1879)Google Scholar