Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:19:04.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Microstructural Evolution of Nanometer Ruthenium Films in Ru/C Multilayers With Thermal Treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

Tai D. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Center for X-Ray Optics, Accelerator and Fusion Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 34720 Department of Materials Science and Mineral Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA. 94720.
Ronald Gronsky
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Mineral Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA. 94720.
Jeffrey B. Kortright
Affiliation:
Center for X-Ray Optics, Accelerator and Fusion Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 34720
Get access

Abstract

The evolution of nanometer Ru films sandwiched between various C layer thicknesses with thermal treatments was studied by plan-view and cross-sectional Transmission Electron Microscopy. Plan-view observation provides information on the Ru grain size, while crosssectional studies allow examination of the multilayer morphology. After annealing at 800°C for 30 minutes, the grain size in the 2 and 4 nm Ru layers show little difference from each other, while that in the I nm Ru layers depends strongly on the thickness of the C layers in the multilayers. It increases with decreasing C layer thickness. Agglomeration of the Ru layers is observed in Inmn Ru / 1nm C multilayers after annealing at 600°C for 30 minutes. The evolution of the microstructures and layered structure stability of the Ru/C system is compared to that of W/C and Ru/B4C systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Spiller, E, AIP Conf. Proc. 75 (New York, 1981) 124; T.W. Barbee, Jr., Ibid., 131.Google Scholar
2. Nguyen, T.D., Gronsky, R., and Kortright, J.B., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 187 (1990) 95.Google Scholar
3. Nguyen, T.D., Gronsky, R., and Kortright, J.B., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 139 (1989) 357.Google Scholar
4. Kortright, J.B. and Denlinger, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 103 (1988) 95.Google Scholar
5. Nguyen, T.D., Gronsky, R., and Kortright, J.B., accepted for publication in J. Elec. Micros. Tech.Google Scholar
6. Nguyen, T.D., Gronsky, R., and Kortright, J.B., Elect. Micros. Soc. Ame. Proc. (1990) 680.Google Scholar
7. Mullins, W.W., J. Appl. Phys. 28 (1957) 333.Google Scholar
8. Srolovitz, D.J. and Safran, S.A., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 1 (1986) 247.Google Scholar
9. Miller, K.T., Lange, F.F., and Marshall, D.B., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1 (1990) 151.Google Scholar
10. Nolan, T., Bevers, R., and Sinclair, R. (Mat. Res. Soc. Meeting. Boston, 1990).Google Scholar