Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:22:43.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Micromachined Lateral Force Sensors for Characterization of Microscale Surface Forces During Chemical Mechanical Polishing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Douglas Gauthier
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, United States
Andrew Mueller
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, United States
Robert David White
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tufts University, Mechanical Engineering, 200 College Ave, Medford, MA, 02155, United States
Vincent Manno
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, United States
Chris Rogers
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, United States
Donald Hooper
Affiliation:
[email protected], Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, 95052, United States
Sriram Anjur
Affiliation:
[email protected], Cabot Microelectronics, Aurora, IL, 60504, United States
Mansour Moinpour
Affiliation:
[email protected], Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, 95052, United States
Get access

Abstract

Micromachined structures with diameters ranging from 50 — 100 μm have been applied to the measurement of the microscale shearing forces present at the wafer-pad interface during chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). The structures are 80 μm high poly-dimethyl-siloxane posts with bending stiffnesses ranging from 1.6 to 14 μN/μm. The structures were polished using a stiff, ungrooved pad and 3 wt% fumed silica slurry at relative velocities of approximately 0.5 m/s and downforces of approximately 1 psi. Observed lateral forces on the structures were on the order of 5–500 μN, and highly variable in time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Evans, C., Paul, E., Dornfeld, D., Lucca, D., Byrne, G., Tricard, M., Klocke, F., Dambon, O., and Mullany, B., CIRP Annals- Manufacturing Technology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 611633, 2003.Google Scholar
2. Paul, E., Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 148, p. G359, 2001.Google Scholar
3. Cook, L., Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 152171, 1990.Google Scholar
4. Sorooshian, J., Hetherington, D., and Philipossian, A., Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 7, p. G222, 2004.Google Scholar
5. Levert, J., Mess, F., Salant, R., Danyluk, S., and Baker, A., Tribology Transactions, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 593599, 1998.Google Scholar
6. Lu, J., Rogers, C., Manno, V., Philipossian, A., Anjur, S., and Moinpour, M., Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 151, p. G241, 2004.Google Scholar
7. Basim, G., Vakarelski, I., and Moudgil, B., Journal of Colloid And Interface Science, vol. 263, no. 2, pp. 506515, 2003.Google Scholar
8. , Feiler, Larson, I., Jenkins, P., and Attard, P., Langmuir, vol. 16, no. 26, pp. 10 269–10 277, 2000.Google Scholar
9. Roure, O. du, Saez, A., Buguin, A., Austin, R., Chavrier, P., Silberzan, P., and Ladoux, B., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 102, no. 7, p. 2390, 2005.Google Scholar
10. Armani, D., Liu, C., and Aluru, N., Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 1999. MEMS'99. Twelfth IEEE International Conference on, pp. 222227, 1999.Google Scholar
11. Sia, S. and Whitesides, G., Electrophoresis, vol. 24, no. 21, pp. 35633576, 2003.Google Scholar
12. Hopcroft, M., Kramer, T., Kim, G., Takashima, K., Higo, Y., Moore, D., and Brugger, J., Proc. JSME Adv. Technol. Exp. Mech, pp. 735742, 2003.Google Scholar