Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:43:21.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mev Ion Induced Modification of The Native Oxide of Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

R.L. Headrick
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
L.E. Seiberling
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the native oxide of silicon (110) and the changes roduced by MeV ion bombardment using transmission ion channeling of 5.9 MeV 9Be, and Elastic Recoil Detection Analysis (ERDA). Transmission channeling was used to measure interfacial nonregistered Si and adsorbed C and 0. ERDA was used to measure the surface concentration of H. MeV ions were found to cause an increase in the interfacial nonregistered silicon which saturates at approximately one monolayer. Rapid desorption of hydrogen was observed. The effect of 2 keV electrons on the silicon native oxide was also studied by Auger Electron Spectroscopy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kinchin, G.H. and Pease, R.S., Rep. Prog. Phys. 18, 1 (1955).Google Scholar
2. Brown, W.L., Lanzerotti, L.J., Poate, J.M. and Augustyniak, W.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. B 40, 1027 (1978).Google Scholar
3. Griffith, J.E., Weller, R.A., Seiberling, L.E. and Tombrello, T.A., Rad. Eff. B 51, 223 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Thomas, J.P., Fallavier, M., Tousset, J., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 187, 537 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Mendenhall, M.H., Ph.D. Thesis, Caltech (1983).Google Scholar
6. Mitchell, I.V., Williams, J.S., Sood, D.K., Short, K.T. and Johnson, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. B 25, 189 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Baglin, J.E.E., Clark, G.J. and Bottiger, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. B 25, 179 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Raider, S.I., Flitsch, R. and Palmer, M.J., J. Electrochem. Soc.: Solid State Science and Technology, p. 413, March, 1975.Google Scholar
9. Cheung, N.W., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 51, 1212 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Ishizaka, A., Nakagawa, K. and Shiraki, Y., 2nd International Symposium on Molecular Beam Epitaxy, Tokyo 1982, p. 183.Google Scholar
11. Feldman, L.C., Silverman, P.J., Williams, J.S., Jackman, T.E. and Stensgaard, I., Phys. Rev. Lett. B 41, 1396 (1978).Google Scholar
12.Havar is a product of Hamilton Technology Inc., Lancaster, PA.Google Scholar
13. Seiberling, L.E. and Headrick, R.L., to be published in the Proceedings of the American Chemical Society, Pottsdam, NY, (June 1985).Google Scholar
14. Moser, F.S., Phys. Rev. B 104, 1386 (1956).Google Scholar
15. Garner, C.M., Lindau, I., Su, C.Y., Pianetta, P. and Spicer, W.E., Phys. Rev. B 19, 3944 (1979).Google Scholar
16. Ibach, H., Bruchmann, H.D. and Wagner, H., Appl. Phys. B 29, 113 (1982).Google Scholar
17. Culbertson, R.J., Feldman, L.C., Silverman, P.J. and Haight, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 20 (1982) 868.Google Scholar